Based on this case:
Percy Green, an African American man who had been employed by McDonnell Douglas, was laid off as a result of a reduction in McDonnell's workforce. After the layoff Green participated in a protest against alleged racial discrimination by McDonnell in its employment practices The protest included a stall-in whereby Green and others stopped their cars along roads leading to the plant to block access during the morning rush hour. At a later date, McDonnell advertised for mechanics. Green applied for reemployment and was rejected by the company on the grounds of his participation in the stall-in, which the company argued was unlawful conduct.
In its ruling, the Court stated that Green had established a prima facie case and that McDonnell had shown a nondiscriminatory reason for not hiring Green because of his participation in the stall-in
Explain the following points:
A case summary
The court's ruling
What this means for the organization in the case study and for businesses in general
What legal precedence the ruling sets for most businesses
The role the federal enforcement agency plays in ensuring the organization's compliance to regulation standards