Organizational paradigms and combinations


Problem:

Look at the organization in which you work or another organization you know well. Provide an example from that organization of one contribution from each of the following schools of thought to the natural paradigm of organizations: Mayo and the Human Relations School, Barnardâ??s cooperative system, Selznickâ??s institutional approach, Parsonâ??s AGIL schema, and the social conflict model. Briefly interpret the role that each of examples you cite plays in your organization.

Mayo and the Human Relations School, Barnard's cooperative system, Selznick's institutional approach, Parsonâ??s AGIL schema, and the social conflict model are all schools of thought within the natural model tradition. Briefly make a case for one of these schools of thought in helping to explain what happens in the organization in which you work or another organization you know well. Why do you choose this school of thought as opposed to the others?

Of all the organizational paradigms and combinations of organizational paradigms you have seen up to now choose the one that makes the most sense and explain why that is the case.

After answering the above three questions, what question has been raised that one can expound upon?

Select an article relating to organizational design and effectiveness from a professional journal or academic publication. Conduct a brief review of the article and post an annotated bibliography of an academic article. Include a paragraph explaining what you learned from reading this article, or what surprised you in the article, or why you consider this article relevant.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Management: Organizational paradigms and combinations
Reference No:- TGS01771367

Now Priced at $25 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)