On the Teleological Argument: o McCloskey claims that to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed. Discuss this standard of indisputability which he calls a very conclusive objection. Is it reasonable? o can you offer an example of design that, while not necessarily indisputable , you believe provides strong evidence of a designer of the universe? o McCloskey implies that evolution has displaced the need for a designer. Assuming evolution is true, for argument s sake, how would you respond to McCloskey o McCloskey claims that the presence of imperfection and evil in the world argues against the perfection of the divine design or divine purpose in the world. How might you respond to this charge by McCloskey?