Nonconsequentialist theory-moral absolutes


The rule nonconsequentialist theories essentially state that there are certain moral absolutes that should never be violated (for example, rules against killing, mutilating, stealing, and breaking promises.) To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea? Are there certain dos and don'ts to which human beings should always adhere? If so, why should they be adhered to and what are they? If not, why not?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Nonconsequentialist theory-moral absolutes
Reference No:- TGS035006

Expected delivery within 24 Hours