Nolan did not inform the union that tti had contractual


Question: Theater Techniques, Inc. (TTI) was a supplier of theatrical props and scenery for Broadway shows. TTI had a subcontract with Nolan Studios to paint scenery and props provided by TTI. Nolan Studios' employees were represented by Local 829, United Scenic Artists, whose collective agreement gave the union jurisdiction over the sculpting and painting of props. When some props from TTI arrived at Nolan already fabricated, the union employees refused to paint them unless Nolan paid a premium rate for the work.

Nolan did not inform the union that TTI had contractual control over the disputed work, but Nolan did file a complaint with the NLRB, charging the union with violating Section 8(b)(4)(B) by refusing to handle the props from TTI to force Nolan to stop doing business with TTI. How should the Board decide the unfair labor practice complaint filed by Nolan? Explain your answer. See United Scenic Artists, Local 829 v. NLRB [762 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1985)].

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Management Theories: Nolan did not inform the union that tti had contractual
Reference No:- TGS02502196

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)