Miller was indicted for embezzlement but subsequently was


James, Kinkaid, the owner of the Kinkaid Company was convinced by Douglas Shaw, one of his employees, that a fellow worker, Miller, had been stealing money from the company. During a break in the company's conference room, Kinkaid fired Miller in front of other workers, accused him of stealing from the company, searched through his brief case over his objections, and finally forcibly escorted him to his office to await the arrival of the police, which he had his assistant summon. Miller was indicted for embezzlement but subsequently was acquitted upon establishing his innocence. What rights, if any, does Miller have against Kinkaid?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Operation Management: Miller was indicted for embezzlement but subsequently was
Reference No:- TGS02913426

Expected delivery within 24 Hours