Justifications for punishment that appeal to beneficial


1. Justifications for punishment that appeal to beneficial consequences (incapacitation, deterrence, and rehabilitation) violate Kant's second variation of the categorical imperative.

a. True
b. False

2. Human needs and desires are best met by cooperating with others.

a. True
b. False


3. Dignity is not something that people must earn or lose through their actions according to Kantian ethics.

a. True
b. False

4. Utilitarianism could allow for disproportionately harsh or lenient penalties if their imposition would achieve the desired end of crime prevention.

a. True
b. False

5. According to Kant, we should always tell the truth-no matter what.

a. True
b. False

6. The goal of disablement is to change the inclinations, motives, habits, and character of the offender so that he or she no longer desires to engage in criminal activities.

a. True
b. False

7. Aristotle argued that virtue was best regarded as an overarching quality of goodness and excellence, not as individual traits.

a. True
b. False

8. According to virtue ethics, consequentialist and deontological theories fail to consider the types of people we should be.

a. True
b. False

9. Under rights-based ethics, certain duties can and should be violated if we determine that other duties override them in a given situation.

a. True
b. False

10. Carliss Lamont argued that people experience their deepest and most enduring joys in association with their peers, friends, or family.

a. True
b. False

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Dissertation: Justifications for punishment that appeal to beneficial
Reference No:- TGS01655790

Now Priced at $5 (50% Discount)

Recommended (98%)

Rated (4.3/5)