Read case problem-
You will also need to read the case which can be located via Lexis in the online library.
In your initial post of no less than 250 words answer the questions, explaining your answer. For your second post, assuming the exculpatory clause is valid, would your answer be different and why.
Your second post should be no less than 150 words. Be sure that you use the law you learned from the chapter and case to explain your answers. Please don't use personal opinions or conjecture.
12-7. Online Acceptances. Heather Reason over opted to try Internet service from Clear wire Corp. Clearwire sent her a confirmation e-mail that included a link to its Web site. Clear wire also sent her a modem. In the enclosed written materials, at the bottom of a page, in small type was the Web site URL. When Reason over plugged in the modem, an "I accept terms" box appeared. Without clicking on the box, Reason over quit the page. A clause in Clear wire's "Terms of Service," accessible only through its Web site, required its subscribers to submit any dispute to arbitration.
Is Reason over bound to this clause? Why or why not?
[Kwan v. Clearwire Corp., 2012 WL 32380 (W.D.Wash. 2012)]
The book is Business Law: Text and Cases, 13e, Clarkson | Miller | CrossCengage Publishing.