Instead of enacting a carbon tax assume that congress


a. Why is it that a carbon tax is preferred to either a Btu tax or a gasoline tax when the objective is to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions?

b. Instead of enacting a carbon tax, assume that Congress decides to provide tax incentives to non-carbon-based energy sources, such as solar and wind power. Would this instrument be cost-effective in reducing CO2 emissions?

c. Now suppose that the government chooses to initiate tax incentives (e.g., a tax credit) for these energy alternatives along with the carbon tax. Would this be a more socially optimal solution? Explain briefly.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Microeconomics: Instead of enacting a carbon tax assume that congress
Reference No:- TGS01213012

Now Priced at $10 (50% Discount)

Recommended (90%)

Rated (4.3/5)