Instead of a merger now consider a monopolisation case with


Two companies in town A apply for a merger. The current competitive price is $100, whichis also the cost per unit for all suppliers in this industry. There is one supplier located intown B, one in town C and one in town D. Town B is 40 kilometres, town C is 70 kilometresand town D is 140 kilometres away from town A. Transportation cost of one unit of theproduct is $0.1 per kilometre.

(a) The competition authority applies the 5%-SSNIP test to define the marketfor this merger application. Explain - in not more than 80 words - the SSNIP test. Whichtowns should be included in the market for the merger assessment?

(b) How would the result change if the CA uses a 10%-SSNIP test? Explainbriefly - in not more than 60 words - the difference.

(c) Instead of a merger, now consider a monopolisation case with a dominantfirm located in town A. All other assumptions are as before. Assume the dominant firmcharged a price above cost equal to $105. What is the relevant market for this antitrustcase when a 5%-SSNIP test is applied? Explain briefly - in not more than 80 words - the"Cellophane Fallacy" in this context.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Economics: Instead of a merger now consider a monopolisation case with
Reference No:- TGS02871960

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (98%)

Rated (4.3/5)