Most conservation biologists and wildlife specialists argue that the Endangered Species Act of 1973 could be made more effective if whole threatened habitats are protected rather than just individual species (that is, the "Sanctuary Approach"). By saving habitats and understanding how endangered and threatened species interact with their habitats, we may be able to make species recovery programs more effective. Critics worry that saving entire habitats will only lead to more violations of the rights of private landowners.
In a recent debate, conservationists are keen to apply the Endangered Species Act to the disastrous impact of climate change on habitats.
Others oppose this interpretation. Efforts have also been made to weaken the Endangered Species for business leaders who say it imposes rules and protections that cost them money and halts commerce.
Should the Endangered Species Act be strengthened to protect the nation's overall biodiversity? (For example, should it be applied to climate change as a form of endangerment?) 2-3 paragraphs needed