In 1983 general motors corporation signed a collective


Question: In 1983, General Motors Corporation signed a collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, under the wage provisions of which new employees joining the bargaining unit were to be paid at a different (lower) hourly rate than current members. A so-called two-tier wage scale resulted from the arbitration of a Postal Service dispute that same year. Since then, a number of other unions have accepted two-tier systems as concessions in their collective bargaining agreements. Labor negotiators commonly refer to such two-tier wage concessions as "selling the unborn." Can you articulate an argument on behalf of these "unborn" (new employees) that two-tier labor contracts violate the union's duty of fair representation? Do you see an Equal Employment Opportunity implication to such an agreement? See "IRRA Panelists Address Two-Tier Implications for Fair Representation and Equal Opportunity" [No. 1 DLR A-5 (1985)].

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Management Theories: In 1983 general motors corporation signed a collective
Reference No:- TGS02502397

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)