Assignment task: Adam Smith's butcher-brewer-baker passage is often used to justify self- interest as motivation for exchange. Albert Carr takes this further, contending that self-interest should take the form of bluffing and deception, and that both are necessary and justifiable in business exchanges. Drawing from Amartya Sen, 2 explain where Carr goes wrong and why commentators have wrongly interpreted the views of Adam Smith. If you think Carr is right, then explain why Sen is wrong. As part of your answer, explain why Sen concludes that, if interpreted correctly, Smith would have thought that business ethics makes "good economic sense"?