X, an interior designer, agrees to decorate Y's living room for A specified price, with the contract proiding that X guarantees Y's "total satisfaction" with her job. When the work is done, Yclaims he is not satisfied. In such a case:
a) If the court feels the contract was one essentially involving ssubjective matters, such as Y's personal color likes and dislikes, and If Y's dissatisfaction is genuine, Y may escape liability to X.
b) If the court feels that a reasonable man would have been satisfied with X's performance, even though it essentially involved subjective matters as in (a) above, Y will probably be held liable to X.
c) If the court feels the contract was one essentially involving matters of utility or mere mechanical fitness (rater than subjective matters), Y will probably be held liable even if he is personally dissatisfied and even if a reasonable man would be dissatisfied with X's work.
d) b and c
e) a and b