Identify the constitutional provision


Assignment task:

SCOTUS FRQ:

Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public school in Providence, at a formal ceremony in June 1989.

For several years the school board and superintendent followed a policy permitting principals to invite members of the clergy to give invocations and benedictions at middle school and high school graduations. Some of the principals decided to include prayers as part of the graduation ceremonies. A rabbi was invited by Principal Robert Lee to deliver the prayer at Weisman's graduation ceremony, and he was given guidelines recommending that public prayers at nonsectarian civic ceremonies be composed with "inclusiveness and sensitivity" (Lee v. Weisman). Deborah Weisman's parents sued Principal Lee to prevent the rabbi from speaking at the graduation ceremony. In this case the Supreme Court ruled that schools could not sponsor even non-denominational prayers.

Use the scenario and your knowledge of U.S. Government and Politics to answer parts A, B, and C.

A.  Identify the constitutional provision that was challenged in both Engel v. Vitale (1962) and Lee v. Weisman.

B. ?Describe one way in which the facts in Engel v. Vitale differ from the facts in Lee v. Weisman

C. ?Explain how the ruling in Engel v. Vitale can be applied as precedent in Lee v. Weisman

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Identify the constitutional provision
Reference No:- TGS03315940

Expected delivery within 24 Hours