The topic is about "Flawed expert testimony causes wrongful prosecution" in the cases of Cameron Todd Willingham and Snow Falling on Cedars. The two stories talk about how evidence is misleading/misinterpreted by experts and how evidence is pushed by racial suspicions.
Explain:
How influential expert testimony can be even when its wrong?
How tunnel vision can strengthen a prosecution at the expense of the truth?
how evidence can give rise to contradictory conclusions as in guilt and innocence?
And how prejudice against a person's appearance can sway a jury? 4 pages