Problem: How does William Paley use the analogy or metaphor of the watch in defense of the claim that God must be the only adequate explanation for the origin of the world?
What kind of explanations for the origin of the world did Paley seek to dismiss as inadequate or as improbable? And how did he explain the invalidity or weaknesses of those explanations? How would either Ernest Nagel or Sally Morem (readings d and e of Section 3) or any of the atheists or agnostics in the video "Does God Exist?" object to Paley's design argument or claim that the origin and design of the world can only be adequately explained by the existence of a creator called God? Please take the time to elaborate.