Problem
In David Chappell's Inside Agitators, what evidence is used to support the argument? How well does he interpret the evidence? How well does he support the argument? What issues, if any, need further clarification or more attention? Does the author ignore issues or evidence that might be used to make a different kind of argument? How is the book organized/structured? In other words, what kind of order does the author impose on the evidence? What does the organizational structure of the book convey about the thought process of the author? What are the dynamic factors of the book? In other words, how does the author account for change over time? What, according to the author, makes things happen? Is the book useful in helping to explain the past? Why or why not? Does the author exhibit any particular bias? Was the author influenced by the period in which he or she wrote the book?