How do courts determine if evidence is reliable and valid


How do courts determine if evidence is reliable and valid before allowing it into testimony?

What is the role of the Frye standard or Daubert standard in determining whether or not the courts will accept biometric evidence?

What rules does your state use in this regard?

How reliable is fingerprint evidence? Consider examples of its use in criminal courts.

How do other biometrics compare to the reliability and validity of fingerprint evidence?

What are some of the challenges associated with lower forms of biometrics, such as facial recognition, and acceptance as evidence in court?

What is the role of the expert witness related to biometric evidence in court?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Science: How do courts determine if evidence is reliable and valid
Reference No:- TGS01077295

Now Priced at $75 (50% Discount)

Recommended (93%)

Rated (4.5/5)