Problem:
When Hewlett-Packard (HP) announced in September 2006 that its Board Chairman, Patricia Dunn, had authorized HP security department to investigate a suspected Board-level press leak and that the investigation included tactics such as obtaining HP Board members and reporters telephone records through false pretenses (conduct known as Pretexting), observers vehemently condemned the operation as illegal and outrageous. In Congressional testimony, however, Dunn defended the investigation as old fashioned detective work. Although Dunn would later claim that she was unaware of key aspects of the investigation, her description was not so far off. The police routinely rely on deception to investigate and apprehend wrongdoers. Although it is tempting to view HP Pretexting.
Additional reference links to scandal:
https://msl1.mit.edu/furdlog/docs/2006-09-18_newsweek_hp_scandal.pdf
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/27/AR2006092701304.html
Answer the following questions in APA response:
Name and describe all stakeholders who were affected by the actions of Hewlett Packard board and chairman?
Describe how all stakeholders were affected by the actions of Hewlett Packards board and chairman?