Hard cases in legal interpretation
Case:
The Lautsi case (Lautsi and others v Italy [2011] ECHR GC (Application no. 30814/06))What is the problem posed by ‘hard cases’ in legal interpretation? Discuss the cogency of a legal method of your choice in addressing this problem.
Expected delivery within 24 Hours
Identify a key principle/doctrine from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. What sources and methods have been (or can be) used to support the legal validity of this principle?
Is it possible to engage in successful legal interpretation without normative commitments?
What do you think a key difference might be between legal arguments and normative arguments in terms of methods, if any, and are there good reasons for keeping them apart?
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969/1980) identifies approaches to interpreting the provisions of a treaty (Articles 31 & 32). Critically discuss one of these approaches (illustrating your discussion by reference to a particular
What is the problem posed by ‘hard cases’ in legal interpretation? Discuss the cogency of a legal method of your choice in addressing this problem.
• To practice presenting data in a statistical process control chart format • To practice interpreting data presented in a statistical process control chart format
Consider the concept of ‘discrimination’ as used in one (and only one) of the following: a) English law, b) European Convention on Human Rights law, or c) International Human Rights law (International Bill of Rights law).
Consider the normative concept of ‘discrimination’. Explain why this is a normative concept and discuss how (methodologically) one can support a substantive account of this concept.
From the above case identify a principle that the court employs in either its ratio or obiter. Explain how you would develop a legal analysis of this principle, and identify legal sources and a legal method used to support it (or that could be use
1941251
Questions Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1431455
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask a tutor for help and get answers for your problems !!
When working with a child under the age of 18, what is a best practice in terms of getting their agreement for counseling?
Based on what we know about empirical research on treatment outcomes using theory, what is the Dodo bird verdict?
Question: When it comes to the development of early counseling theories, which one of the following is true?
Scherazade and Roderick, married for 13 years, are a happy couple in love with life, each other, and their family. They met 14 years ago
Concede this the client is a 15 year old straight male who came in today wiht his mom looking to re engaging with outpatient therpy
Identify an ethical boundary or boundaries that were crossed in the experiment?
Question: Which of the following is a key characteristic of schizoid people?