Goldman argued that cohen was in violation of the fdcpa


55th Management Corp. in New York City owns residential property that it leases to various tenants. In June 2000, claiming that one of the tenants, Leslie Goldman, owed more than $13,000 in back rent, 55th retained Jeffery Cohen, an attorney, to initiate nonpayment proceedings. Cohen filed a petition in New York state court against Goldman, seeking recovery of the unpaid rent and at least $3,000 in attorneys' fees. After receiving notice of the petition, Goldman filed a suit in a federal district court against Cohen. Goldman contended that the notice of the petition constituted an initial contact that, under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), required a validation notice at the time, or within five days, of the notice of the petition. Therefore, Goldman argued that Cohen was in violation of the FDCPA. Should the filing of a suit in state court be considered "communication," requiring a debt collector to provide a validation notice under the FDCPA?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: Goldman argued that cohen was in violation of the fdcpa
Reference No:- TGS02416619

Now Priced at $10 (50% Discount)

Recommended (97%)

Rated (4.9/5)