Discussion Post: Philosophy- God and Proof
Compare the efforts made by Anselm and by Thomas Aquinas to argue for the existence of God. (Anselm's proof is on p. 189, Aquinas' on pp. 192-196.) In what ways are they similar and in what ways are they different?
Both Anselm and Aquinas were men of profound faith. Why, then, were they trying to prove that God exists, when they already had faith? Do you believe that any of these arguments could inspire faith in someone who does not already accept a monotheistic religion?
Objectives:
o Identify and describe key concepts presented in textbook reading material, video lectures, and other assigned content.
o Draw connections between assigned content material and practical areas of interest.
o Explore ideas in philosophical depth beyond the presentation of course material.
o Draw connections between philosophical discourse and one's practical life.
o Engage in respectful philosophical conversation.
The response should include a reference list. One-inch margins, Using Times New Roman 12 pnt font, double-space and APA style of writing and citations.