Problem
After you have both considered the Bystander case and judged it permissible to pull the lever, your friend pats you on the back and says, "at least you got this one right!" (Remember, according to your friend, your earlier judgment about the Footbridge case was incorrect.)
You're frustrated that you can't articulate the justification for your intuitive moral judgment about the Footbridge case (alas, you can't explain the doctrine of double effect), but you remember something from the Language unit of COGSCI 200 that might help you show your friend you're not mistaken.
With reference to Mikhail's model of moral judgment, craft a response to your friend that:
1. Draws an analogy between how grammaticality judgments are produced and how moral judgments are produced
2. Explains why you can't articulate the justification for your moral judgment ; and
3. Identifies a normative assumption that Mikhail is committed to.