Problem
The prosecution believes that Ella stole 1.5 million dollars from her previous employer but Ella claims she didn't. At the pre trial admissibility hearing I would like to know if Ella's personal spending in the last 4 months would be a significant evidence and be admissible in court. Ella spent $100,000 on drugs and $100,000 on night clubs in the past 4 months after the theft occurred. Does this satisfy section 7 and 8 of the Evidence Act 2006 and can this be used as evidence at a pre trial admissibility hearing? Is Ellas spending in the past 4 months admissible as evidence? And why exactly using section 7 and 8 of the evidence act 2006
Explain in depth because some Tutors are telling me that it is admissible and some are saying it's inadmissible.