Problem
A. The Parol Evidence Rule prohibits parties from introducing evidence of other issues when a contract is taken to be the entirety of the agreement. There are a few exceptions to this rule. One is that the parties can present their intent when a contract has ambiguous language. How would you go about ensuring that a contract is clear? Explain how you would avoid ambiguity.
B. Legality What are the differences and similarities between a maintenance contract and a two-party contract? Is there enough detail in the event of a problem with capacity or legality that results in a breach? Will you have to shut down a business if the contracts cannot be completed?
C. Explain the requirements of the Statute of Frauds for both contracts. Explain what changes need to be made if you need to revise a portion of a previously prepared contract(s)