Problem:
Robert Bork's failed nomination is widely seen as a pivotal moment that transformed the Supreme Court confirmation process. The Senate's rejection of Bork in 1987 was based not just on his qualifications as a jurist but significantly on his judicial philosophy and interpretation of the Constitution. Bork's originalist views were perceived as too extreme by many Senators and public interest groups, which led to a highly publicized and contentious confirmation battle. This event set a precedent for using ideological and partisan considerations to a much greater extent in evaluating Supreme Court nominees. The Bork nomination marked the beginning of a more polarized and conflict-ridden confirmation process. It introduced the concept of "borking," a term used to describe the intense scrutiny and strong opposition by interest groups that nominees might face. Future nominations increasingly reflected ideological battles, and the confirmation process became a spectacle driven by partisan politics. This shift has contributed to an environment where nominees are often evaluated more on their perceived ideological stances rather than just their professional qualifications and integrity.
Rewrite in standard form. Need Assignment Help?