Problem: Reply. The U.S may be the only country with true global military reach, but having that power doesn't automatically mean there's a moral obligation to intervene in every unjust conflict. In theory, stopping stronger countries from harming weaker ones sounds like the "right" thing to do. But in practice, interventions can get messy fast. There's also the issue of selective action, choosing to intervene in some places and not others can make it seem like decisions are based more on political or economic interests than pure morality. Conflicts in Africa highlight the importance of these situations. A military response might stop violence in the short term but fail to address the root causes, leaving the same problems to resurface later. In some cases, the U.S could be more effective by applying diplomatic pressure, providing humanitarian aid, and supporting regional peacekeeping forces, helping local powers develop the capacity to manage their own conflicts. That way, the U.S can still play a role in protecting the vulnerable without always acting as the world's default military enforcer. Need Assignment Help?