Problem: The middle stage of group development is often where therapeutic depth and complexity converge; however it is not without its challenges. Kaklauskas and Greene (2020) describe the middle phase as one where anti-therapeutic processes can emerge. In this phase, the facilitator's role shifts from creating structure to naming resistance and inviting reflection. In previous groups I have participated in, this has been both helpful and hurtful to the group dynamics. One instance where it has been harmful relates to the participants roles within the group. As group roles become established and reinforced, natural leaders often emerge to help guide the process, offer perspectives, and actively engage in group activities. At the same time, other members may settle into more peripheral roles, choosing to take a backseat and engage less directly with the group process. When group members become fixed in rigid roles, such as dominant leaders and disengaged observers, it can negatively affect the group as a whole. Over reliance on a few vocal leaders may limit the diversity of perspectives, reduce shared responsibility, and create power imbalances that inhibit open dialogue. Over time, these entrenched roles can reinforce avoidance, resistance, and inequity within the group, ultimately constraining depth, mutual learning, and the group's capacity for meaningful change. word count: 208 References Kaklauskas, F. J., & Greene, L. R. (Eds.). (2020). Core principles of group psychotherapy: Need Assignment Help?