Course Project
Code of Ethics and Evaluation Paper
Your task is to create an original Code of Ethics and Evaluation Paper for your company or organization. You may also choose to create a Code of Ethics for a fictitious company or organization if you prefer not to use your employer. Codes of conduct for military do not qualify for this assignment. In your company Code of Ethics, please include the following:
· guiding principles,
· purpose of the code,
· core values,
· training and education,
· definitions,
· what employees it covers,
· how it will be implemented/communicated,
· how it will be enforced and reported,
· mission statement, and
· other pertinent elements you feel necessary to have a comprehensive Code of Ethics.
The Evaluation part is to include the following:
· stakeholders,
· strategic ethical formulation,
· strategic ethical implementation,
· ethical monitoring mechanisms, and
· ethical performance.
Please include a short introduction and background of the company/organization and a summary of the Code of Ethics and Evaluation in the paper. This assignment must be at least 2000 words in length, double spaced, and 12pt New Times Roman font. The title page and reference pages are not included in the required paper length. CSU requires that students use the APA format in writing course papers. Therefore, the APA rules for formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and listing of sources are to be followed. Your paper should contain at least five references in addition to the textbook and may include Internet sources, books, and professional journals or other pertinent resources. Do not copy or plagiarize others materials. Use references less than four years old.
Every corporation has a culture. This culture is influenced by individual and groups of different moral suasions. Research Kholberg's Stages of Moral Development.
1. Discuss how Kholberg's Stages of Moral Development might impact the culture of an organization, and thus the ethical condition in that organization?
Substantiate your all your comments and responses. Avoid the use of Wisegeek, NetMba, Wikipedia, excessive use of dictionaries and encyclopedias, and sources of that nature, which are not considered reputable sources, when substantiating your comments and responses.