Problem:
Respond to peers post: Supervision can be broadly conceptualized as either a mentoring relationship, where a senior professional supports a junior clinician's professional development, or as a more intervention-oriented process that emphasizes the supervisee's personal and psychological growth in ways that can resemble therapy processes (Bernard & Goodyear, 2019). From a mentoring perspective, the strengths are clarity and structure. Mentoring-centered supervision prioritizes skill acquisition, ethical practice, case conceptualization, and accountability, which helps protect clients while supporting the supervisee's competence and professional identity development (Bernard & Goodyear, 2019). Practical tools (e.g., goal setting, direct feedback, session review, and intentional planning of the supervision experience) can make expectations explicit and reduce ambiguity (Bernard & Goodyear, 2019). However, mentoring-only supervision can be limited when affective factors-such as anxiety, counter transference, burnout, or cultural stressors, significantly influence clinical judgment. If these dynamics remain unaddressed, technical feedback may not translate into improved practice (Bernard & Goodyear, 2019). In contrast, an intervention/growth-oriented approach can strengthen reflective capacity by attending to the supervisee's internal processes, relational patterns, and emotional reactions to clinical work (Bernard & Goodyear, 2019). Need Assignment Help?