Assignment:
Each of the following scenarios involves conduct/words that may, or may not be constitutionally objectionable. Choose any one of the two following scenarios. In 250 words or more, discuss/describe when "fighting words" and the advocacy of illegal conduct may be constitutionally prescribed. You must reply to at least one classmate's posting in a minimum 150-word reply. Points will be deducted for failing to meet the requirements!
To get full credit you will need to: Provide an example of researched, recent case law.
Scenarios:
1. Dick calls Harry a "damned fascist" and a "damned racketeer" in the presence of several people, while attending a crowded party. Is Dick's expressive activity protected by the First Amendment?
2. Tom walks into a public park, sees two police officers, and exhorts 20 people who happen to be in the vicinity to: "Get your guns and come out shooting. That's the only way to protect our liberties from big government." Is Tom's expressive activity protected by the First Amendment?
Readings:
Equal Protection Under the Law: Balancing Individual, State and Federal Rights
By Tony Wolusky