Question: We've been having some trouble figuring out how we arrive at moral judgments. Cultural Relativism, Supernaturalism, Intuitionism, Rationalism. All seem to have their good points, but also their undermining bad points. Then what do you say to picking out our moral principles by trying to be informed and imaginative, and then seeing what we can consistently hold? Even if our moral beliefs can't be provable from facts, perhaps we could take the positions that "we ought to do this" as a universalizable prescription, and then add: "Do this and let everyone do the same in similar cases."
Agree? Disagree? Why?
And then consider logical "rules" that might go along with this position? For instance, we must be logically consistent, right? To be so, must we not make similar evaluations about similar cases? And also, to be do so, must we not keep our moral beliefs in harmony with how we live and want others to live? Do any others come to mind?