Consideration for promise of caruso


Case Problem:

Question 1. Calley sold an automobile to Bailey, delivered the car and received the full purchase price. Ten days after the sale Bailey discovered that Calley had sold similar cars and had made agreements with the buyers to keep the cars in repair for one year free of charge. Bailey drove the car to Calley's garage and demanded that Calley make a similar agreement with him. Calley accordingly gave Bailey a written agreement stipulating that he would cover all necessary repairs for a period of one year free of charge. At the end of nine months the car required overhauling and Bailey had the repairs made at Calley’s garage at the cost of $850. Is Calley liable for the repairs?
 
Question 2. DeLuca owed Caruso $5,000 which was due and unpaid. DeLuca was negotiating for the purchase of a new house and realized that if Caruso demanded payment of the $5,000 after he had invested all his available cash in the new house, he, DeLuca, would be in an unfortunate predicament. He therefore went to Caruso and explained the whole situation to him, and requested a one-year extension of the $5,000 debt. Caruso expressed willingness to go along under the circumstance and gave DeLuca a written promise not to sue on that obligation for the period of one year. Two days later, and before DeLuca had entered into a binding agreement to purchase the new house, DeLuca received a letter from Caruso revoking his promise and demanding immediate payment of the $5,000 debt, and in which he threatened to sue for the debt if payment was not made immediately. Answer the following questions relating to these facts, and discuss your reasons fully:
 
(a) Is there consideration for the promise of Caruso not to sue for one year?
(b) Could the written promise not to sue be subject to any other argument for enforceability by DeLuca?
(c) In what regards, if any, would your answers to (a) and (b) above be changed if DeLuca had entered into an agreement to purchase the house before his receipt of Caruso's letter?
 
Question 3. West mailed the following note to Carter:
 
January 8, 1989
 
Because of our long friendship, I promise to send you $2,000 within a week. I know you can use the money for your son's college tuition, and you can sue me for it if I don't pay. Witness my hand and seal.
 
(Signed) John B. West
 
West never paid the $2,000. The week having passed, Carter brings suit against West. Who wins? Discuss fully the principles of law involved.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Consideration for promise of caruso
Reference No:- TGS01869595

Expected delivery within 24 Hours