Case-johnson versus fresh mark


Case Problem:

Employee was designated male at birth and on her driver’s license, but considered herself a woman. When she used both the male and female bathrooms at work, her employer asked her to supply a letter from her doctor indicating her gender. Her attorney wrote saying that she was not entirely male or female, and was, instead, intersexed. Employer tells employee she can only use the men’s restroom. If the employee had not notified the employer that she was intersexed, and possibly within Title VII, would employer be held liable for discrimination? [ Johnson v. Fresh Mark, Inc., 337 F. Supp. 2d 996 (N.D. Ohio 2003).]

Your answer must be typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Case-johnson versus fresh mark
Reference No:- TGS01977409

Expected delivery within 24 Hours