Belmont resists arguing that the act of nationalization by


Prior to 1918, a Russian corporation had deposited sums of money with August Belmont, a private banker doing business in New York City.

In 1918, the Soviet government nationalized the corporation and appropriated all of the corporation's property and assets, including the deposit account with Belmont. The deposit became the property of the Soviet government until 1933, when it was released and assigned to the U.S. government as part of an international compact between the United States and the former Soviet Union. The purpose of this arrangement was to bring about a final settlement of the claims and counterclaims between the two countries. The United States brought an action to recover the deposit from Belmont.

Belmont resists, arguing that the act of nationalization by the Soviets was a confiscation prohibited by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and was also a violation of New York public policy. Explain who will prevail.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Belmont resists arguing that the act of nationalization by
Reference No:- TGS02187611

Expected delivery within 24 Hours