Assuming the existence of a complete and final written


Assuming the existence of a complete and final written contract, the parol evidence rule generally would prohibit evidence of:

a. Prior or contemporaneous oral statements that alter, contradict, or add to the terms of the contract.

b. Prior or contemporaneous oral statements that explain ambiguities in the contract.

c. Subsequent oral statements that modify the contract.

d. A and C.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Assuming the existence of a complete and final written
Reference No:- TGS0636302

Expected delivery within 24 Hours