Discuss the below:
Q: The "Introduction" and the article "On the Peripatetic Life of Objects in the Era of Globalization" in Sheriff offer perspectives on how historic objects (ex. Mechenheim's The Mass of Saint Gregory) depict two stories. Each of these stories speaks to different audiences. Can you think of an object or visual thing in contemporary society that means one thing to one group of people and something very different to another when they look at it? Using research into the actual history of that object and using Farago as a theoretical guide, describe the mechanics of that hybrid expression. Is one interpretation more valid than another? If so, why? If not, why not?