Problem:
A classic example of the unreliability of eyewitness accounts is the case of Ronald Cotton, who was wrongfully convicted of rape based largely on the testimony of the victim. Years later, DNA evidence exonerated him, highlighting serious flaws in the eyewitness identification process.
Are eyewitness testimonies always credible? Why or why not? Support your response with scholarly sources and examples. Citations are not required. However, please provide a link to any outside resources you reference, as necessary. Need Assignment Help?