A research study was conducted to examine the efficacy of


Assignment

Please conduct hypothesis tests for the following questions.

1) A research study was conducted to examine the efficacy of studying in groups. Students were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a single person group (individual studying), a group that had two study partners, and a group that had three study partners. After four weeks of studying, the students were given an exam. The raw scores are below. The data are presented below.

 

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

 

78

82

74

 

87

79

86

 

76

82

86

 

65

83

85

 

92

81

95

 

78

90

94

 

77

89

86

 

88

79

71

 

85

83

88

 

92

81

85

Mean

81.8

82.9

85

Standard deviation

8.508819

3.754997

7.527727

H0: μ1 = μ2 = u3 = μr, all the means are the same
H1: two or more means are different from the others

Conclusion The sample means have different means and thus we reject he null hypothesis because the mean for group 1 is 81.8 while group 2 is 82.9 and group 3 is 85.

2) Mr. Rotondo is concerned about the level of knowledge possessed by various majors regarding United States history. Students from various majors in the three academic areas of the College were asked to complete a standardized U.S. history exam. The Academic area for students was also recorded. Data in terms of percent correct is recorded below for 30 students.

 

Natural Science

Social Science

Humanities

 

62

82

80

 

81

92

87

 

75

81

87

 

88

80

74

 

67

72

88

 

68

71

79

 

76

68

82

 

86

76

85

 

82

68

72

 

76

86

65

Mean

76.1

77.6

79.9

Standard deviation

8.478076

8.002777

7.578478

H0: μn = μs= uh = μr, all the means are the same

H1: two or more means are different from the others

Conclusion

The sample means have different means and thus we reject he null hypothesis because the mean for natural science is 76.1 while social science is 77.6 and humanities is 79.9 and the variance is different

3) A genetics engineer was attempting to cross a tiger and a cheetah. She crossed 150 tigers and cheetahs. Based on prior research she expected that 25% of the animals would have a phenotypic outcome of stripes only: 25% would have 3 spots only: and 50% would have both stripes and spots. When the cross was performed and she counted the individual cubs she found 45 with stripes only, 41 with spots only and 64 with both.

Chi-square = S (O-E)2/E

D.F.   Value

1        3.841

2        5.991

3        7.815

Set up a table to keep track of the calculations:

Expected ratio      Observed # Expected #  O-E   (O-E)2               (O-E)2/E

25% stripes          45               37.5            7.5     56.25          1.5

25% spots            41               37.5            3.5     12.25          0.33

50% stripes/spots 64               75               -11    121             1.61

100 total               150 total     150... total 0 total                   Sum = 3.44

25% * 150 = expected # of stripes = 37.5

25% * 150 = expected # of spots = 37.5

50% * 150 = expected # stripes/spots = 75        

Degrees of Freedom = 3 - 1 = 2 (3 different characteristics - stripes, spots, or both) Since 3.44 is less than 5.991, we fail to reject the null hypothesis put forward by the engineer.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Applied Statistics: A research study was conducted to examine the efficacy of
Reference No:- TGS02293724

Now Priced at $40 (50% Discount)

Recommended (92%)

Rated (4.4/5)