Start Discovering Solved Questions and Your Course Assignments
TextBooks Included
Active Tutors
Asked Questions
Answered Questions
Do you agree with the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima? Why or why not. Discuss three of the main reasons for the rise of the Civil rights movement.
How is character defined in the sport ethics literature? What sports studies shown relative of effects of sport participation on moral development of athletes?
What type of mood and tone does the performance create? How? What are your feelings about this performance? What did you take away from viewing it?
What would social contract ethics have said to have done? Why would social contract ethics say that? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
What kind of conversation would Machiavelli have with one of the philosophers we studied previously (Plato, Xenophon, Augustine, Al-Kindi)?
What are some of the major developments and/or achievements in your cumulative experience project thus far?
Discuss how the Divine Command Theory arises in the Euthyphro dialogue and how it presents a problem for the religious foundations of morality.
Which Abraham do you admire more, the one who challenges God's decision. What does this debate suggest to you about your own reliance on faith? On reason?
What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position?
How would you defend a belief in an all-loving and all-powerful God along with an acceptance of the reality of evil?
How are vagueness, ambiguity and generality used in politics or in law in order to achieve a desired outcome?
Explain Plato's Utopian vision for a just society. What about people who discover or develop their true talents later in life?
Does alienation as described by Marx exist today in modern capitalist societies? What aspects of Marx's philosophy do you see in the clip on domestic workers?
Be clear about the evaluative criteria with which you will assess NAFTA. Then share your policy recommendations and explain your reasoning.
What did the speaker specifically do to project character? How did the speaker specifically show that she/he cared about the audience?
Explain though they are distinct and share a common thread. Discuss why Ad hominem arguments usually made? Are such argument even valid?
Does the thesis concretely sum up what your colleague is arguing or asserting thus far? What one new thing have you learned by reading this writing?
Do the sections in the paper thus far connect well to the thesis? How do they add insight to the thesis? Do you have any suggestions of further connections?
For this milestone, you will respond to a contemporary moral debate using what you have learned about Kantian ethical principles.
What philosophical ideas we have read about do you think is informing the speaker's thoughts? You can use general theories or specific theorists.
Discuss, from your point of view, how their thoughts contribute to thinking about the question of the meaning of life.
What is an indispensability argument? What problems do such arguments face? How should we demarcate genuine science from pseudo-science?
Write a short philosophical essay that (i) explains what it could mean to say that human existence is absurd and without any ultimate meaning.
Explain how either or both of these works can help us understand the challenge to truth that has developed in our time.
What cultural norms did you learn as a child? What stereotypes are connected to those cultures?