--%>

Worse off and better off condition in economics changes

When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain Economics as the extensive

    Economics can be explained as the extensive study of the effects of: (w) money and why having this is good. (x) production costs and profits. (y) how people attempt to gratify their boundless needs. (z) purchases, acquisitions and mergers.

  • Q : Assignments I want it tomorrow night or

    I want it tomorrow night or before, please.

  • Q : Governmental allocations of goods I

    I have a problem in economics on Governmental allocations of goods. Please help me in determining the accurate answer of the following question. Pure capitalism is least reliable with: (i) Governmental allocations of goods. (ii) Laissez-faire policies

  • Q : Decisions and owns resources The

    The Economic systems are categorized mainly according to: (1) Who makes decisions and who owns the resources. (2) Which political parties are in the power. (3) The extent of economic growth. (4) How efficiently resources are employed.

    Q : Define subjective opportunity cost for

    Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost... If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe

  • Q : Find cigarette taxes testing in

    Positive economic analysis would take in testing a theory which raising cigarette taxes would: (1) harm smokers much more than it helped non-smokers. (2) enhance social welfare by reducing smoking from teenagers. (3) boost cigarette prices and decreas

  • Q : Existence of shortages or surpluses

    Shortages or surpluses exist while: (w) transaction costs are zero. (x) quantity supplied be different from quantity demanded. (y) monopolists enjoy exorbitant profits. (z) supply prices equivalent demand prices. H

  • Q : Uses of Normative Economics over

    Can anybody propose the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Normative Economics. Positive economic analysis might NOT be used to test the idea which higher cigarette taxes would reas

  • Q : Case of priceless in relative prices

    While people sincerely refer to something like "priceless", so they most likely mean that this is: (a) mostly meaningless to name a monetary price since its opportunity cost is more high. (b) worthless junk on that they place no value. (c) irreplaceab

  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w