--%>

Worse off and better off condition in economics changes

When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain about entrepreneurship I need a

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestions that entrepreneurship, labor, capital and land are all illustrations of: (w) producer's supplies. (x) goods and services. (y) income streams. (z) productive resources.

  • Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit

  • Q : Problem on violating someone rights Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Fee simple property rights do not permit private owners to: (1) Deny utilization of their goods to others. (2) Trade such rights with other people. (3) Employ goods in manner

  • Q : Entrepreneur in economic profit

    Economic profit is the entrepreneur's: (i) payment to managers for their services. (ii) capital stock minus depreciation. (iii) reward for innovation and bearing risks. (iv) difference between monetary cost and total income. (v) opportunity cost for capital.

  • Q : When scientific economic analysis NOT

    Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below: Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) on

  • Q : Assertion of a normative statement

    How can I solve my economics problems? Please suggest me the right answer for an illustration of a normative statement, would be the assertion which: (w) bald men are intelligent. (x) balding advances along with age. (y) bald men must wear toupees. (z) strength and hi

  • Q : Where is economic efficiency for

    Economic efficiency for society does not need that such: (w) the greatest possible satisfaction is enjoyed through all consumers specified their individual budgets. (x) maximum possible value of output from obtainable resources. (y) exact goods are us

  • Q : Existence problem regarding each and

    Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for existence problem regarding every society. Every society should answer questions regarding “How?, for Whom? and What?” due to the exist

  • Q : Divisions of labor in production

    Economic efficiency tends to be improved via: (1) Divisions of labor in specialization and production and trade according to comparative advantage. (2) Maximization of the opportunity costs. (3) Understanding macro-economics. (4) Intensive investments

  • Q : Define subjective opportunity cost for

    Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost... If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe