Why do not you utilize GNU SCONS or autoconf for building
Why do not you utilize GNU SCONS or autoconf for building?
Expert
The short answer is that when you get this from CCP4, this does. If you determine it from me it doesn't, since autoconf is unreasonably complex and I have better options to fill my head along with.
The long answer is that while Paul (who is an autoconf guru) and I set up autoconf for clipper this took us a week, and needed sufficient specialist knowledge which I couldn't really maintain this. By contrast, while I set it up with SCONS, this took me less than a day and was easily maintainable; though at that stage SCONS didn't handle other platforms very well. Therefore, I distribute development versions of clipper along with simple build scripts which in fact work for me, CCP4 distribute release versions along with autoconf since they have enough experience to keep it, and PHENIX distribute this with SCONS since that's what they use. When you want an autoconf version, use the CCP4 release (granted it’s all the time a bit out of date).
How would the developer describe all variables using referential data types?
Describe about generating a report tool by utilizing the report tool and the report wizard?
Write a short note on the difference between embedded and dynamic SQL?
Should I use numerous devices to take benefit of Partitions in Sybase?
What do you understand by the term ACID transaction in DBMS? Describe briefly?
What is the archtetype or instance pattern?
What do you understand by the term locking in DBMS?
Justify whether all the Business Objects users build the data providers?
Briefly explains the three kinds of SQL commands?
Give a brief introduction of the term real time data-warehousing?
18,76,764
1926130 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1430884
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!