Why do not you utilize GNU SCONS or autoconf for building
Why do not you utilize GNU SCONS or autoconf for building?
Expert
The short answer is that when you get this from CCP4, this does. If you determine it from me it doesn't, since autoconf is unreasonably complex and I have better options to fill my head along with.
The long answer is that while Paul (who is an autoconf guru) and I set up autoconf for clipper this took us a week, and needed sufficient specialist knowledge which I couldn't really maintain this. By contrast, while I set it up with SCONS, this took me less than a day and was easily maintainable; though at that stage SCONS didn't handle other platforms very well. Therefore, I distribute development versions of clipper along with simple build scripts which in fact work for me, CCP4 distribute release versions along with autoconf since they have enough experience to keep it, and PHENIX distribute this with SCONS since that's what they use. When you want an autoconf version, use the CCP4 release (granted it’s all the time a bit out of date).
Give details why an information gap exists in most organizations?
Explain briefly the term an outer join?
Explain the term transformer stage?
Explain the way through which we can publish BO report?
Explain the term optimization and performance tuning and its work in practical projects?
Name the triggers which support SQL Server 2000?
Specify the types of the tracing level?
Can we have a report with several data providers?
Explain does PL/SQL carry overloading?
Illustrate the term data mart. What do you mean by it?
18,76,764
1931762 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1456691
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!