--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Instance Diminishing Marginal Utility

    Assume that you were permitted to eat as many ‘free’ jelly beans as you want at present. Subsequent to a few, you start to eat more slowly and to select some flavors over others. You might ultimately stop eating a ‘free’ and enjoyable good sinc

  • Q : Efficiency of monopolistic competition

    Defenders of the efficiency of monopolistic competition are mainly persuasive when they insist which: (w) consumers benefit greatly from product differentiation. (x) any inefficiency is far less harmful than that of pure monopoly. (y) pure competition

  • Q : Equilibrium price when demand increase

    When an increase in demand arises at similar time as a decrease in supply, in that case equilibrium price: (w) falls, and equilibrium quantity is unsure. (x) increases, and equilibrium quantity is uncertain. (y) remai

  • Q : Problem on Current labor union issues I

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on Current labor union issues. Please help me in the following question. The current labor union issues would comprise: (i) Public sentiment favoring the legislative control of strike powers. (ii) Reduction of

  • Q : NOT price discriminate by monopoly Into

    Into equilibrium, a monopoly which does NOT price discriminate will tend to produce: (w) the socially optimal rate of output. (x) a level of output where price exceeds marginal social cost. (y) lower output at lower prices than a competitive market. (

  • Q : Economic efficiency of purely

    Most economists favor purely competitive markets since they tend to as: (1) economies of scale. (2) large profits. (3) mutual interdependence. (4) corporate organizations. (5) economic efficiency. Hello guys I want

  • Q : Monopsony Power and Demand for Labor

    When wage discrimination is not possible for first 40 workers then this profit-maximizing firm hires, however it can wage discriminate perfectly whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (i) Forty workers at an average wage of the

  • Q : Complements for good Can someone help

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Price hikes outcome less substitution away from a good the more: (i) Close substitutes there are for good. (ii) Various uses there are to which the good was place at lower price. (iii) Extende

  • Q : Internal financing in Corporate Finance

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. The corporations might get internal financing by: (i) Borrowing from the stockholders. (ii) Reinvesting the corporate income rather than paying it out as the dividends to stockholders. (iii)

  • Q : Funding crisis The Social Security

    The Social Security program in the United States faces a long-term funding crisis because: 1) the Social Security trust fund was exhausted in the year of 2002. 2) the number of retirees receiving benefits is rising more rapidly than the number of workers paying payrol