--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Personal discrimination Personal

    Personal discrimination: (1) may impede economic discrimination. (2) fosters wage, employment, occupational, and human capital discrimination. (3) causes housing prices to exceed levels affordable by the poor. (4) is the only cause of occupational dis

  • Q : Production costs-Consumer Sovereignty I

    I have a problem in economics on Production costs-Consumer Sovereignty. Please help me in the following question. In the market economy, output patterns mainly reflect: (i) Individual votes by each and every consumer. (ii) The requirements of majority

  • Q : Purely competitive market at

    For a purely competitive market at any equilibrium point on the short-run supply curve: (w) all firms have identical marginal costs. (x) economic profit is positive. (y) accounting profit is normal. (z) marginal revenue = average cost.

    Q : Determining type of good An increase in

    An increase in the income of Consumer X leads to fall in demand for that good by that consumer. Name the good X termed? Answer: Inferior good

  • Q : Excessively high production costs to

    The merely fast food restaurant conveniently located close to a fast-growing suburb may be rather profitable despite sloppy management and poor quality control. There market power can enable several firms along with excessively high production

  • Q : Short-run market supply curve of a

    Short-run market supply curve of a competitive industry is derived by summing all the firms’: (1) average cost curves vertically. (2) short-run supply curves horizontally. (3) production capacities along with the resources available. (4) individ

  • Q : Total revenue for profit-maximizing TR

    TR stands for total revenue for this profit-maximizing pure competitor as in below figure equals area: (i) 0Phq2. (ii) 0bgq2. (iii) Pbgh. (iv) 0aeq1. (v) daef.

    Q : Gaining more Consumer Surplus I have a

    I have a problem in economics on gaining more Consumer Surplus. Please help me in the following question. Sushi lovers would be most probable to gain more consumer surplus as an outcome of rises in the: (i) Price of the steamed rice. (ii) Supply of sushi. (iii) Income

  • Q : Discrimination and Income Differentials

    By 2000, the differential among the rich and the poor which can be attributed to economic discrimination was computed at: (w) approximately 60 percent. (x) approximately 30 percent. (y) under 10 percent. (z) zero.

  • Q : Low-income elasticities of demand

    Placing an excise tax upon goods along with low-income elasticities of demand will share out the tax burden as: (1) proportionally between high-income and low-income households. (2) disproportionately on high-income households. (3) disproportionately