--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Structure conduct performance paradigm

    From about 1890 till 1970, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” dominated theories concerning how firms behave in various kinds of markets. The word “conduct” in this context refers to these things as: (i) decisions by

  • Q : Calculating Firms accounting profit I

    I have a problem in economics on Calculating Firms accounting profit. Please help me in the following question. The firm has $50,000 in implicit costs, and the economic profit of $10,000. This firm’s: (i) Explicit cost equivalent $40,000. (ii) Accounting profit

  • Q : Consumers and corrupt governmental

    I have a problem in economics on Consumers and corrupt governmental processes. Please help me in the following question. John Kenneth Galbraith believes that the big corporations: (1) Must be broken up to the foster competition. (2) Manipulate the con

  • Q : Opponents of the current welfare system

    Opponents of the current welfare system who desire the welfare system scaled down tend to argue which this: (1) has constantly experienced funding cuts for the past decade. (2) cannot succeed in helping poor people within a market economy. (3) stimula

  • Q : Law of Diminishing Merginal utility Law

    Law of Diminishing Merginal utility: This states that as consumer consumes more and more units of commodity, the utility derived from each and every successive unit goes on decreasing. According to this law TU increases at decreasing rate and the MU d

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand and

    When the price elasticity of demand for Japanese cars is higher within Europe than into the U.S. and transportation costs are very similar, relative to the price charged in Europe, there the price a discriminating Japanese carmaker wo

  • Q : Imposition of price ceilings The

    The imposition of price ceilings which are below equilibrium generally results within: (w) shortages and net decreases in economic efficiency. (x) more efficient allocations of scarce resources. (y) greater consumer satisfaction and b

  • Q : Example to illustrate non-tariff trade

    Imports and American cars are close nevertheless not ideal substitutes. When the U.S. government tried to boost American car sales through setting a price ceiling of P1 upon imported cars in that case: (w) the quantity of cars imported will

  • Q : Demand of consumers-supply of seller

    Consumers’ demand prices and sellers’ supply prices may be different in equilibrium due to: (w) arbitrage. (x) expectations about availability. (y) the invisible hand. (z) government subsidies or tax wedges.

  • Q : Problem on competitive equilibrium

    The economy consists of an equal number of smokers (S-types) and asthma sufferers (A-types). Good 1 is cigarettes, good 2 is “other stuff.” S-types have the utility function: xS1 + xS