--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Adequate resources to escape a state of

    When individuals or families have adequate resources [for example, employment opportunities] to escape a state of destitution, although choose not to, they are experiencing as: (1) involuntary poverty. (2) relative poverty. (3) a vicious cycle of pove

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand Elucidate

    Elucidate any four factors which affect the price elasticity of demand.

  • Q : Stockholders of a big business

    I have a problem in economics on Stockholders of a big business corporation. Please help me in the following question. The stockholders of a big business corporation: (1) Frequently manage the everyday output decisions. (2) Usually own big percentages of the total sha

  • Q : Monopsony and Marginal Resource Cost

    The labor monopsonist which doesn’t wage discriminates consists of a marginal resource cost curve [or marginal factor cost curve] which is above the labor supply curve then the firm faces as: (1) Monopsonists encompass market power in the markets for output. (2)

  • Q : Quantity demanded grows with price cut

    A price elasticity of demand coefficient of 2.5 approximately implies that: (1) quantity demanded rises 1 percent while price rises 2.5 percent. (2) quantity demanded grows 2.5 percent along with a 1 percent price cut. (3) price rises 2.5 percent whil

  • Q : Limits to statistical method Limits to

    Limits to statistical method: The mechanics of generating data and undertaking statistical analysis and modeling with that data are relatively straightforward. What is less clear is the process of structuring the scope and content of an empirical stud

  • Q : Difficulty of competitive firms to

    Competitive firms determine this difficult to exploit consumers as: (w) consumer boycotts generate bad publicity. (x) market distributions of products are uniformly fair. (y) government price ceilings equivalent opportunity costs. (z) prices that exceed costs attract

  • Q : Unemployment among skilled workers

    Rises in the legal minimum wage rate have not been blamed for rising: (i) Unemployment among the teenagers. (ii) Racial discrimination in the employment. (iii) Unemployment among trained workers who have lost their jobs since of competition from the cheaper imports. (

  • Q : Short Run-input of firms cannot be

    I have a problem in economics on Short Run-input of firms cannot be changed. Please help me in the following question. In short run, the firm: (i) Can change any input. (ii) Can’t change any input. (iii) Cannot change the output. (iv) Has at lea

  • Q : Theory of production and cost in long

    In the theory of cost and production, the long run is the period: (i) Of 1-year or longer. (ii) Of 5-years or longer. (iii) In which we all are dead. (iv) Permitting the capacity to wholly adjust. Can someone pleas