--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Simulated demand A department store

    A department store faces a decision for a seasonal product for which demand can be high, medium or low. The purchaser can order 1, 2 or 3 lots of this product before the season begins but cannot reorder later. Profit projections (in thousands of euro) are shown below:

  • Q : Arising of perfect price discrimination

    Perfect price discrimination would arise when a firm: (1) extracted full consumer surpluses from its customers. (2) permitted monopolistic customers quantity discounts. (3) redistributed real income among consumers. (4) inefficiently allocated its res

  • Q : Principle of equal marginal utilities

    The thought that, in equilibrium, the more you pay for the good, more it is worth (that is, at the margin) to you is most intimately associated to the: (1) Law of diminishing returns. (2) Equivalent satisfaction corollary. (3) Veblen effect. (4) Rising cost hypothesis

  • Q : Arbitrage and Transaction Costs The

    The individual or organization which simultaneously purchases low and sells high in various markets is a/an: (i) Elevator. (ii) Speculator. (iii) Analyst. (iv) Arbitrageur. (v) Operator. Can someone please help me in finding out th

  • Q : Requirements for pure competition The

    The needs for pure competition are most intimately met by the market for: (i) domestic (American) steel. (ii) comic books. (iii) sugar-coated cereal within your local grocery store. (iv) stocks and bonds traded on Wall Street after they have been issu

  • Q : Examples of pairs of complementary goods

    I have a problem in economics on Examples of pairs of complementary goods. Please help me in the following question. The illustrations of pairs of complementary goods would comprise: (1) Coffee and tea. (2) Butter and margarine. (3) Motor boats and wa

  • Q : Investment by profit-maximizing pure

    For such illustrated figure profit-maximizing pure competitor, there area aPed shows: (1) fixed cost (TFC). (2) average fixed cost (AFC). (3) the lowest possible economic loss. (4) maximum economic profits. (5) the rate of return on investment. <

  • Q : Explanation of Substitution Effect The

    The substitution effect helps most in describing why: (1) Demand curves slope down. (2) Goods are either complements or substitutes. (3) Air travel costs less than by walking the cross country. (4) Uncertainty regarding quality justifies govt. control

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand Elucidate

    Elucidate any four factors which affect the price elasticity of demand.

  • Q : Short-run supply curve of the firm For

    For a competitive firm the short-run supply curve is the: (w) marginal cost curve which is above the average total cost curve. (x) marginal cost curve which is above the average variable cost curve. (y) upward sloping part of the marginal cost curve.