--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Production function Describe three

    Describe three properties of a variable proportions production function that make sure that it allow profit maximization and cost minimization.

    		•
  • Q : Elasticity and profit maximization at

    When a monopolist which does not price discriminate produces output where is demand is unitarily elastic, in that case the firm will: (i) never be capable to maximize profit. (ii) maximize profit only when all costs are fixed. (iii) maximize profit wh

    		•
  • Q : Demand prices exceeds supply prices

    When only Q0 papayas reached the market in that case: (1) desperate buyers would be willing to pay only P1 per papaya. (2) production costs would exceed P2 per papaya. (3) buyers would be indifferent regarding getting additional papaya

    		•
  • Q : Neoclassical economics One of my

    One of my friends can't find the answer of this question .Give me answer of this question. How are economic theories created in neoclassical economics?

    		•
  • Q : Predictable results of unexpected

    Predictable results of unexpected development of demand for a competitively produced good comprise increases and in that case gradual decreases in the: (w) price of the good and the profits of producers. (x) consumer surplus derived from the good. (y)

    		•
  • Q : Reduction in demand of Complementary

    Mold that damaged the hamburger crop following a flood would be most probable to decrease the demands for: (i) fried chicken with gravy and mashed potatoes. (ii) Soda pop and bottled water. (iii) Carrots, cucumbers and egg plant. (iv) Ketchup and mustard. (v) Sushi an

    		•
  • Q : Graphical relationship depicted by

    Demand curves graphically depict the relationships which are: (i) Positive among the demand for a good and its relative price. (ii) Negative between the quantity demanded and the opportunity cost of a good. (iii) Positive between income and expenditures. (iv) A horizo

    		•
  • Q : Least Relative Market Interest Rate

    Market interest rates are least associated to the: (1) willingness of people to defer consumption (to save) when they are rewarded for doing so. (2) relative liquidities of alternative financial assets. (3) marginal productivity of new capital relativ

    		•
  • Q : Example of variable in Short Run The

    The resource which a carpet manufacturer is most probable to view as the variable in short run would be: (i) The warehouse it owns (ii) Truck driver. (iii) The truck on a 5-year lease agreement. (iv) Firm’s biggest factory. C

    		•
  • Q : Difference between Collusive and

    Difference between collusive and non-collusive oligopoly. Elucidate how oligopoly firms are interdependent in taking price and output decisions.

    		•