--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Making investment possible in an

    The group which ultimately makes investment in an economy possible is: (1) business firms. (2) households which consume less than their disposable incomes. (3) banks. (4) savings and loan associations. (5) financial tycoons.

    Q : Illustration of Substitution Effect

    Sally is very rich that money hardly matters to her, although when the price of JIF chunky peanut butter doubled Sally switched to Peter Pan chunky peanut butter. This alters is an example of the: (1) Income effect. (2) Payback effect. (3) Substitution effect. (4) Pri

  • Q : Corporate Finance and Retained Earnings

    I have a problem in economics on Corporate Finance and Retained Earnings. Please help me in the following question. The corporate income reserved by the corporation subsequent to paying corporate income taxes and dividends to the owners of general sto

  • Q : Problem on Paradox of Value I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on Paradox of Value. Please help me in the following question. Since diamonds are much expensive as relative to water, the: (i) Fundamental needs of people don’t comprise water. (ii) Consumer surplus from consuming the di

  • Q : Problem on perfectly competitive

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The profit-maximizing firm which is perfectly competitive in the resource market however which has the market power in output market will hire labor at a point where: (1) VMP =

  • Q : Explain about supply curve A supply

    A supply curve which is: (i) vertical is perfectly price elastic. (ii) horizontal is perfectly price inelastic. (iii) linear and goes through the origin has a price elasticity of one. (iv) rectangularly hyperbolic is also unitarily elastic. (v) trapez

  • Q : Problem on fast food chains market

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Total utility of water in Paradox of

    Clean drinking water is accessible at a much lower price than the costs of equal amounts of gold. This actuality is most reliable with the outcome that whenever a consumer is in equilibrium, then the: (i) Net utility of water is very higher than its marginal utility,

  • Q : Lower market price to cover average

    When the market price is lower to cover average total costs, in that case a profit-maximizing firm will: (i) shut down instantly. (ii) continue to operate where P = MC when P > AVC. (iii) adopt newer technology. (i

  • Q : Economies of Scope problem In the year

    In the year 1960s, suburbanites start to landscape by employing bark which had formerly been discarded whenever Clear-Cut Forestry Products turned logs to lumber whereas decimating old-growth forests. The extra operating revenue to Clear-Cut from selling bags of bark