--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Competition and Rivalry When new firms

    When new firms enter an imperfectly competitive market, in that case the demand curves of the firms previously in the market will: (w) shift to the left. (x) shift to the right. (y) become vertical. (z) become horizontal.

    Q : Value of Marginal Product Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The value of marginal product of the variable resource is its marginal product multiplied by: (1) The marginal revenue from sale of its addition to the output. (2) The price of

  • Q : Labor Force Participation Rates The

    The percentage of a specific population who is either unemployed or employed or is termed as the: (i) Labor force participation rate. (ii) Work-force proportion. (iii) Income-leisure loss curve. (iv) Substitution effect dominance rate. (v) Labor supply.

  • Q : Yield behaviour conflicting law of

    Which of the given statements, if true, seems most probable to yield behavior which would conflict with the law of demand? (i) People cannot afford to drive as much whenever the price of gasoline goes above $3.00 per gallon. (ii) The greater heroin addicts encompass i

  • Q : Social welfare function What do you

    What do you mean by a social welfare function? If you assume that such a function exists, what properties of social optima would be considered by you? Discuss such properties.

  • Q : Derived Demand for Labor in competition

    The faddish popularity of Atkins and South Beach diets both, and both of that advise dieters to eat more meat and to decrease the intake of starchy carbohydrates, most likely decreased incomes most sharply for: (1) grocery store clerks. (2) cattle ran

  • Q : Problem on rational ignorance An

    An illustration of rational ignorance is demonstrated when you: (1) Are elected to a political office. (2) Settle for an other half who is not your "ideal" mate. (3) Eat a steak which increases your cholesterol level. (4) Were suspended from high scho

  • Q : Raise current consumption by rising in

    When interest rates rise, in that case the opportunity costs of: (1) current consumption rise. (2) future consumption rise. (3) current investment decline. (4) government budget deficits decline. (5) saving grows proportionally.

  • Q : Shifting of taxes on higher prices When

    When a tax on goat cheese is totally paid by consumers through higher prices, in that case the tax has been: (1) alleviated. (2) actualized. (3) backward shifted. (4) forward shifted. (5) randomized. Hello guys I w

  • Q : Consumption expenditure In an economy

    In an economy 75% of increase in income is spent on the consumption. Investment raised by Rs. 1000 Crore. Compute: (A) Total increase in income(B) Total increase in consumption expenditure