--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Reduced monopoly power by oligopolistic

    The allocative inefficiency commonly related with the exercise of market [i.e., monopoly] power tends to be reduced when oligopolistic firms: (1) differentiate their products by competitive advertising. (2) price discriminate based upon the price elas

  • Q : Introduction of marginal utility The

    The marginal utility (MU) of a good: (1) Was first introduced by Adam Smith. (2) Is simply measured in dollars. (3) Is determined by society as an entire. (4) Reflects subjective preferences. Can someone help me in getting through

  • Q : Holding less liquid assets in investment

    When households become more willing to hold less liquid assets, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) present value of future income falls. (y) interest rate falls. (z) stock market will crash. I need a go

  • Q : Ownership shares in corporation I have

    I have a problem in economics on Ownership shares in corporation. Please help me in the following question. The Ownership shares in a corporation are termed as: (1) Bonds. (2) Entrepreneurial capital. (3) Common stock. (4) Total worth. (5) Retained equity.

  • Q : Income elasticity of positive and

    This given figure as in below demonstrates how consumption of goods A, B, C and D varies like a family’s income changes. Since income rises, the income elasticity of demand is positive and increasing for: (w) good A. (x) good B  (y) good C.

  • Q : Morphological attribute After the

    After the morula phase what is the subsequent stage? What is the morphological attribute which defines this phase?

  • Q : Rent controls fix rent in equilibrium

    Rent controls which fix rents below equilibrium will NOT: (w) maintain monetary rents down. (x) create shortages of rental housing. (y) stimulate non-market allocations of rental housing. (z) maintain the opportunity costs of housing down.

  • Q : Explain Subsidiary function Elucidate

    Elucidate the Secondary or Subsidiary function? Answer: 1) Standard of deferred payments: Money is executing as deferred Payment

  • Q : Tastes and Preferences in travel

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Raised ‘love boat’ ticket sales in response to a sequence of stunning travel commercials point out a raise in the: (i) Quantity of romantic vacations demanded. (ii) Demand for the

  • Q : Problem on quantity of Whopper Slushees

    When Adam Smith’s invisible hand executed with no government intervention, this market would be in equilibrium and quantity of Whopper Slushees demanded the quantity supplied would be equivalent at: (i) Price P1. (ii) Quantity Q1. (iii) Price P3. (iv) Quantity Q