--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Occurrence of the price discrimination

    Price discrimination occurs when a good is: (1) priced by a formula yielding monopoly profit. (2) denied to customers who refuse to pay the going price. (3) sold at different prices not reflecting differences in costs. (4) subject to government price

  • Q : Regulatory barrier to entry Billy

    Billy recently invented and in that case patented a motorized flying skateboard which transports people to and from their destinations in less than half the time this would take to ride or drive a bus. Billy is protected from competition from a: (1) regulatory barrier

  • Q : Industry demand curve identity

    Babble-On maintains world-wide patents for software which translates any of 314 spoken languages within text, along with automatic audio and text translations within any of the other three-hundred-thirteen languages. When Babble-On is a pure monopoly, such firm confro

  • Q : Consumers and corrupt governmental

    I have a problem in economics on Consumers and corrupt governmental processes. Please help me in the following question. John Kenneth Galbraith believes that the big corporations: (1) Must be broken up to the foster competition. (2) Manipulate the con

  • Q : Influence on the total cost of plans of

    For a negative income tax the break-even level of income plan (NIT) is: (1) negatively related to the plan’s basic income floor. (2) positively related to the negative income tax rate. (3) a main influence on the total cost of t

  • Q : Vigorous competition by firms in an

    Allocating scarce resources hence they are put to the uses which best satisfy consumer wants is facilitated through: (w) highly bureaucratic, centralized decision making. (x) tax breaks for wealthy people which “trickle down” to consumers. (y) vigorous com

  • Q : Economic project Hello, Would you

    Hello, Would you please find a project in managerial economic in the attachment. Please tell me in which price you will be solve it and when you complete it? NOTE: I attach tow files (one is the project and another as the sample for it) I choose Starbucks company for the project. A Special N

  • Q : Consumer Surplus-Difference in amounts

    Kiley pays $1.00 for the cold Pepsi on a hot afternoon, however would be willing to pay $5.00. The $4.00 difference in such amounts is her: (i) Consumer surplus. (ii) Income effect. (iii) Economic gain. (iv) Marginal utility. (v) Pleasure coefficient.

    Q : Right-to-Work Laws-Union membership Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. When it is illegal to need a union membership as the condition of employment for a firm, then the firm: (1) Needs all the employees to sign yellow dog contracts. (2) Can’t sign an agency

  • Q : Evidence for Diminishing Marginal

    Evidence that may potentially be cited as conflicting with the law of diminishing marginal utility would comprise: (i) Della’s enthusiasm for all-you-can-eat buffet diminishes subsequent to her fifth plate of lasagna. (ii) Jethro trades in his 1981 Gremlin on th