--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Large numbers of potential sellers in

    Features of pure competition do not comprise: (w) homogeneous products.(x large numbers of potential buyers. (y) important barriers to entry. (z) large numbers of potential sellers. Can anybody suggest me the prope

  • Q : Profit-maximizing monopolistic

    When price discrimination is not possible this profit-maximizing monopolistic competitor charges a price of $______ as well as produces ___________ units of output: (w) $12 || 5 thousand. (x) $15 || 8 thousand. (y) $16 || 7 thousand.

  • Q : Relative price of the good The demand

    The demand curve depicts a negative relationship among price and quantity demanded since the quantity demanded rises if there is a decline in the: (1) Size of the family. (2) Incomes of the consumer. (3) Relative price of good. (4) Price of the substitute good. <

  • Q : Consumer Surplus-Difference in amounts

    Kiley pays $1.00 for the cold Pepsi on a hot afternoon, however would be willing to pay $5.00. The $4.00 difference in such amounts is her: (i) Consumer surplus. (ii) Income effect. (iii) Economic gain. (iv) Marginal utility. (v) Pleasure coefficient.

    Q : Aggregate effective demand Why,

    Why, according to Keynes, is investment the key economic variable? Why does he think that the volatility of investment spending is likely to cause a problem of aggregate effective demand? Why does he think that this problem can only be solved by government interventio

  • Q : Problem on reducing Complementary Goods

    The failure of spaghetti crop would be most probable to decrease the: (1) Supply of cheap red wine. (2) International rate of inflation. (3) Demand for potato salad. (4) Demand for the spicy tomato sauce. (5) Prices of dinners in an Italian restaurant.

    Q : Market period disequilibrium At the

    At the price P1, this purely competitive Christmas tree industry is within: (w) long-run equilibrium. (x) short-run equilibrium. (y) market period disequilibrium. (z) short-run disequilibrium.

    Q : Unimportant economies of scale If

    If comparing market structures, when economies of scale are unimportant: (w) the most efficient form of market structure is a pure monopoly. (x) purely competitive industries and price discriminating monopolies are equally efficient. (y) price discrim

  • Q : Different pure economics rent Pure

    Pure economic rents are different most from economic profits in which they are: (w) received by the owners of productive resources. (x) frequently costs to the firm using the resources which generate them, but not to society as a whol

  • Q : Labor Union-union membership The basic

    The basic idea that unions are more influential than ever before is: (i) Supported by the consequences of unions on inflationary spirals. (ii) Reflected in the growing numbers of violent and expensive strikes. (iii) Contrary to the fact that union membership is refusi