--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Strategic barriers to entry Extensive

    Extensive national advertising can be a form of: (1) natural barrier. (2) strategic barrier. (3) regulatory barrier. (4) price discrimination. (5) moral hazard. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

  • Q : NOT cartelized product in market power

    Products which have NOT been cartelized comprise: (w) oil. (x) bananas. (y) sugar. (z) wheat. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

  • Q : Patent new invention included in

    Predatory behavior would not comprise: (w) aggressive advertising. (x) monopolizing access to essential resources. (y) lowering prices. (z) getting a patent on a new invention which is likely to start a new industry.

    Q : Problem Regarding to Contestable Markets

    Even though the concentration ratio for an oligopoly is close to hundred, firms may operate rather efficiently when the market: (1) price conforms to a limit pricing model. (2) is contestable since entry and exit are easy. (3) demand curve is unitaril

  • Q : Minimum average costs at production

    Nostalgia Corporation could accomplish minimum average costs for Silver Screen DVDs when this produced: (i) 4 million DVDs. (ii) 6 million DVDs. (iii) 8 million DVDs. (iv) 10 million DVDs. (v) 12 million DVDs.

  • Q : Demand for Labor-Monopsony Power When

    When wage discrimination is not probable for the first 40 workers this profit-maximizing organization hires, however it can wage discriminate perfectly whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (i) Forty workers at an average salary of $700 per we

  • Q : Purchasing ratio maximizing the total

    The consumer who spends income and hence the ratio of MUs of all goods purchased equivalents the ratio of their prices is: (i) Maximizing net utility. (ii) Spending too much. (iii) Beyond the point of diminishing negative utility. (iv) Behaving incompatibly through pu

  • Q : Law of Diminishing marginal utility

    Describe the Law of Diminishing marginal utility? Answer: Law of Diminishing marginal utility: As a consumer goes on consuming more and more units of a commodity th

  • Q : Consumers for Mortgage Funds Not in

    Not in between the total demands for loanable funds would be the demands of: (1) consumers for financial capital. (2) business firms for financial capital. (3) government for loanable funds to cover budget deficits. (4) consumers for mortgage funds. (

  • Q : Difference among change in

    The difference between change in supply and change in quantity supplied is as follows: (1) The change in quantity supplied is caused just by the change in the price of good, whereas a change in supply takes place whenever the ceteris paribus suppositi