--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Charging price by long run operating

    Most monopolists whom continue to operate in the long run are capable to charge a price as: (w) greater than minimum average total costs [ATC]. (x) less than MR. (y) less than marginal costs [MC]. (z) less than which of a pure competitor along with si

  • Q : Determine the yearly total revenues

    When the U.S. wheat market as in below demonstrated graph is primarily within equilibrium on S0D0, in that case the yearly total revenues (price × quantity) of wheat farmers will equivalent: (1) 0P4gQ4

  • Q : Relatively price elastic when supply

    Even though a drought decreases supply from S1 to S0, at each point along both of such supply curves, the supply of tanks of dehydrated water: (i) perfectly price elastic. (ii) relatively price elastic. (iii) unitarily price elastic. (iv) relativ

  • Q : Various kinds of capital goods Supply

    Supply curves for different kinds of capital goods are usually: (w) perfectly elastic. (x) perfectly inelastic. (y) upward sloping. (z) downward sloping. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanati

  • Q : Market Power and Monopsony Power-

    Assume that a firm with market power in the output market wants to develop and that hiring more workers needs it to raise salaries 8 percent for all the workers. Output prices will most likely: (i) Increase 8 percent to cover the wage rise. (ii) Increase less than 8 p

  • Q : Price floor for Whopper Slushees The

    The government price floor for Whopper Slushees at P3 would result a: (i) shortage of Q1 – Q3. (ii) Excess of Q3 - Q1. (iii) Supply price of P1. (iv) Quantity demanded of Q2. (v) Demand price of P2.

    Q : Reason of existence of firms Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The primary reasons for the existence of firms would not comprise: (1) Collecting sales taxes for government. (2) Entrepreneurial drives for the potential gains. (3) Cutting tra

  • Q : Value of Nonhuman Wealth The most

    The most unequally variable distributed for U.S. data would most likely be: (1) pre-tax and pre-transfer incomes 1929. (2) incomes after taxes and transfers 1975. (3) the value of nonhuman wealth 2005. (4) incomes after taxes and transfers 2005. (5) incomes before tax

  • Q : Critics of contribution standard of

    Critics of contribution standard of the income distribution often: (w) cite inequality as evidence of inequity. (x) assert which private individuals must not be capable to accumulate any assets. (y) believe charitable giving should be

  • Q : Levels of output by monopolistic

    Monopolistic competitors generate levels of output which are: (w) more than socially optimal and equitable. (x) economically efficient. (y) where marginal social benefits exceed marginal social costs. (z) certain to generate economic profits.