--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand among

    The price elasticity of demand as in below illustrated figure for DVD games among prices of $20 and $30 is about: (w) 1.00. (x) 25. (y) 1/25. (z) 1/2.

    Q : Purely competitive firm in pure

    A purely competitive firm: (w) maximizes profits where MR=MC. (x) makes economic profits while its total revenue is greater than its total cost. (y) has no control over the price of its products. (z) all of the above.

    Q : Positively sloped long run industry

    A purely competitive industry produces a positively-sloped long-run industry supply curve when the industry: (i) includes only firms which experience diseconomies of scale. (ii) is an increasing cost industry. (iii) experiences technological advances

  • Q : Elasticity of supply when product

    Since the supply of land is fixed, then the: (w) demand for land is absolutely horizontal. (x) supply of land is completely elastic. (y) demand for land is absolutely vertical. (z) supply of land is perfectly inelastic.

    Q : Demand curve when taxes shifted forward

    Taxes will be shifted forward completely when supply is positively sloped as well as the demand curve is, there contrary to economic reasoning: (1) perfectly inelastic. (2) perfectly elastic. (3) unitarily elastic. (4) flatter than supply.

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation-labor union

    The labor union contracts, a comparable worth rule, or minimum salary laws might boost up equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (i) Price discrimination. (ii) Monopolistic exploitation. (iii) Feather-bedding. (iv) Blacklisting. (v) Monopsonistic expl

  • Q : Negatively relative interest rate

    Interest rates tend to be negatively associated to: (w) household preferences for more liquid assets. (x) typical rates of return on alternative investments. (y) household willingness to delay consumption. (z) investor optimism concerning rates of ret

  • Q : Firm under perfect competition The firm

    The firm beneath perfect competition is a price taker by the reasons shown below:A) Number of firms: The number of firms beneath perfect competition is so big that no individual firm by changing sale, can cause an

  • Q : Demand for Labor-Monopsony Power When

    When wage discrimination is not probable for the first 40 workers this profit-maximizing organization hires, however it can wage discriminate perfectly whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (i) Forty workers at an average salary of $700 per we

  • Q : Barriers to entry and long run

    A firm which realizes an economic profit in the short run will carry on generating economic profits in the long run only when: (i) it maximizes economic revenue. (ii) barriers to entry prevent entry from rival firms. (iii) its managers minimize princi