--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Measure Liquidity An asset’s associate

    An asset’s associate “liquidity” is inversely measured through the: (w) transaction costs in dealing within the asset as a proportion of the market price of the asset. (x) time it takes to convert this to cash. (y) “backing&rdq

  • Q : Break Even Income A marginal tax rate

    A marginal tax rate of 50 percent and an income floor of $6,500 yield a break even income of: (w) $3,250. (x) $6,500. (y) $9,750. (z) $13,000. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics

  • Q : Problem regarding Wage Discrimination I

    I have a problem in economics on Problem regarding Wage Discrimination. Please help me in the following question. The economic term applied if equally productive workers are paid various wages is: (i) Wage discrimination. (ii) Racism. (iii) Employment

  • Q : Price taker in the context of a firm

    What is meant by the word price taker in the context of a firm? Answer: It means that firm does not contain any control over the price and it has to pursue that pri

  • Q : Problem on certainty of punishment

    Raising the severity and certainty of punishment decreases the cheating on examinations. This statement imitates: (1) Misplaced cynicism as this issue is ethical, not economic. (2) Purely normative views of the behavior. (3) Unrealistic expectations regarding student

  • Q : Examples of adverse selection Which of

    Which of the given below statement is not an illustration of the adverse selection? (i) You agree on a price for utilized car; however the dealer did not tell you it requires a new clutch. (ii) You send in money to a mail order company, however do not

  • Q : Maximizing utility from consumption of

    Given that a MU of French fries of 35 utils and a MU for the serving of potato chips at 25 utils, when their respective prices are $1.50 and $.80, a person who wishes to maximize the utility from the consumption of both of such goods would consume: (1) The similar amo

  • Q : Short run expectations Can someone help

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. When Toyota expected the price at which it could sell its cars to increase in the near future, it’s very short-run response would possibly be to: (i) Raise its supply. (ii) Reduce its su

  • Q : Law of supply regarding firms I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Law of supply regarding firms. Please help me in the following question. The law of supply signifies that: (i) Firms provide less for sale at lower prices. (ii) Purchases and prices differ inversely. (iii) Minimum inve

  • Q : Entrepreneurs explicit costs The

    The entrepreneur’s explicit costs would comprise: (1) Forgone interest on owner’s savings. (2) Value of entrepreneur’s labor. (3) Interest payments on the business loans. (4) Lost salaries from the entrepreneur’s preceding job.