--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Liabilities for damages and penalties

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The Caveat venditor is an ancient legal doctrine which encourages: (i) Consumer exploitation. (ii) a ‘buyers beware’ approach. (iii) Enforcement of the seller’

  • Q : Concentration ratio Explain the concept

    Explain the concept of a concentration ratio.  Is the concentration ratio in a monopolistically competitive industry likely to be higher than for a perfectly competitive industry

  • Q : Flatter demand curves for goods Demand

    Demand curves tend to be flatter for goods such that: (w) are necessities than for luxury goods. (x) absorb smaller shares of family income. (y) have more close substitutes obtainable. (z) have more close complements within consumption.

  • Q : International demand or supply affected

    Sixty Chinese manufacturers have started producing generic staplers. Since each factory is very small to noticeably influence the international demand or supply for staplers, every firm is: (1) a cartelized seller. (2) a price taker. (3) a primary goo

  • Q : Shifting demand of labor The demand for

    The demand for labor will shift because of changes in all of the given except: (w) prices of other resources. (x) prices of output. (y) MPP (z) wages. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for

  • Q : Adverse Selection as a classifiable

    Which of the given below conditions is most evidently classifiable as the adverse selection? (i) The company manufactures a miracle weight loss solution guarantee enduring weight loss, however in realism the solution only rids surplus water weight for

  • Q : Example to illustrate non-tariff trade

    Imports and American cars are close nevertheless not ideal substitutes. When the U.S. government tried to boost American car sales through setting a price ceiling of P1 upon imported cars in that case: (w) the quantity of cars imported will

  • Q : Problem on equilibrium price Refer to

    Refer to the following data. Equilibrium price will be:  A) $4. B) $3. C) $2. D) $1. Give the answer of above questaion

  • Q : Increase profit of cartel-member A

    A member of a cartel would be probably to increase its profits by: (1) undercutting the prices of other cartel members when this did not get caught. (2) setting its price above which of other cartel members. (3) aggressive nonprice marketing promotion

  • Q : Coefficient of price elasticity Why the

    Why the coefficient of price elasticity of demand is is negative?