--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Supply of labor in perfectly

    Supply of labor in perfectly competitive market

  • Q : Change in Supply versus change in

    Assume that a screen at the front of this room exhibits a graph of supply curve for ice-cream. The shift of this supply curve away from the center of our Earth would replicate: (i) A raise in the quantity of ice-cream demanded. (ii) A reduction in the supply of ice-cr

  • Q : Example of determining new equilibrium

    As per such supply and demand curves for peanuts, there is the: (w) demand for peanuts has fallen. (x) price rises to P1 due to better peanut technology. (y) production of peanuts was initially Q0. (z) new equilibrium price of pe

  • Q : Average revenue and marginal revenue

    In spite of of the amount sold, price equals for a price-taker firm on both average: (i) revenue and marginal revenue. (ii) variable cost and marginal cost. (iii) fixed cost and average variable cost. (iv) total cost and marginal revenue.

  • Q : Demand when price of good or resource

    When the price of a good or resource drops, the demands for: (i) That good or resource raise. (ii) Complementary goods or resources reduce. (iii) Substitute goods or resources reduce. (iv) Luxury goods and inferior resources drop.

  • Q : Elasticity of Supply Elasticity of

    Elasticity of Supply: The law of supply states us that quantity supplied will react to a modification in price. The notion of elasticity of supply elucidates the rat

  • Q : Positive economic profit and accounting

    Purely competitive equilibrium, in long-run firms normally experience positive accounting profit and economic profit which is: (w) also positive, but smaller. (x) zero. (y) negative, but barely that why. (z) either positive, zero, or negative.

  • Q : Question on lowering the supply The

    The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of whe

  • Q : Present Value of Future Income The

    The present value of future income is: (w) higher, the higher the interest rate. (x) lower, the higher the interest rate. (y) unaffected by the interest rate. (z) purely objective, and not subjective at all. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics pr

  • Q : Theory of microeconomic game in market

    The theory of market structure which several microeconomic game theorists were ready to toss within the dustbin of intellectual history into the 1970 year but that, in the early 1980s, turned into a foundation for the “new&rdquo