--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Production falls and price of demand

    A candy factory generated 5.2 million packages of gummy worms in this year as well as sold them for $1.27 all. Last year this sold 4.7 million packages of gummy worms of $1.36 all. Such firm’s gummy worms have price elasticity of demand roughly

  • Q : Monopsony power-Purely competitive Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Dissimilar to a purely competitive hirer of labor, the firm with monopsony power can: (i) Both set any wage it wishes and hire as many workers as it desire

  • Q : Monopsonistic labor market-wage

    In the monopsonistic labor market in which wage discrimination is not possible, the raise in the minimum wage: (i) Essentially outcomes in less employment and higher wages. (ii) Might result in both the higher level of employment and the higher wage rate. (iii) Unifor

  • Q : Income elasticity-distribution and

    The time people focus upon politics and government policies tends to be income elastic. Nonetheless, high wage rates raise the opportunity costs of voting. Mutually, these facts suggest that, which relative to wealthier or higher-income people and low

  • Q : Market demand in short run purely

    Ceteris paribus, inside the short run an increase into the market demand for this product would permit this purely competitive firm to be: (w) make only normal profits. (x) break even. (y) make economic profits, although not in the long run. (z) compe

  • Q : On which point demand appears to be

    On this demonstrated figure of demand curve for DVD games, demand appears to be approximately unitarily elastic at: (w) Q = O, P = $50. (x) Q = 10, P = $O. (y) Q = 5, P = $25. (z) No point on the demand curve.

    Q : Economic inefficiency per unit of output

    When this firm cannot price discriminate, after that the rate of economic inefficiency per unit of output which its exercise of market power yields equals to: (i) area 0PbQ0. (ii) distance af. (iii) area 0fcQ0. (iv) distance bc. (v) r

  • Q : Increase in Income Tax Progressivity

    When this figure demonstrated Lorenz curves for distribution of income after taxes and transfers, in that case it is UNTRUE of the Lorenz curves demonstrated in this demonstrated figure that: (1) line 0E0' represents a Lorenz curve of

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium of purely

    At the price P1, the given figure of purely competitive cranberry industry is within: (w) long-run equilibrium. (x) short-run equilibrium. (y) market period disequilibrium. (z) short-run disequilibrium. <

  • Q : Risk-Return-Diversification The below

    The below table presents the three possible states for stocks A and B returns. (a) De