--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Saving in Negatively Investment Saving

    Saving is positively related to and investment is negatively related to: (1) marginal benefits and marginal costs. (2) real interest rates.  (3) returns onto alternatives. (4) expectations. (5) government surpluses and deficits.

    Q : Relatively price inelastic for prices

    Suppose that all these illustrated curves are infinitely long straight lines. Then supply curve which is relatively (although not perfectly) price inelastic for all prices and quantities is: (1) supply curve S1. (2) supply curve S2

  • Q : Substitute goods in cross-elasticity of

    The cross-elasticity of demand among any pair of goods is positive when the goods are: (i) luxuries. (ii) necessities. (iii) complements. (iv) substitutes. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of

  • Q : Income-Satisfaction boundaries Demand

    The maximum amounts of a good that people are willing and capable to buy at different market prices during a specific period are depicted by: (1) Horizontal summations. (2) Income or satisfaction boundaries. (3) Demand curves. (4) Consumption possibilities frontiers.<

  • Q : Evidence of Asymmetric information Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The Extensive fire damage in a neighborhood where almost everyone has fire insurance is an apparent evidence of: (1) Cost inflation in service sector. (2) Ineffective resource a

  • Q : Adjust production in profit-maximizing

    Adjust production in all profit-maximizing firms to a level where the marginal: (i) revenue most greatly exceeds average total cost. (ii) revenue curve is at its maximum height. (iii) cost curve is at its lowest point. (iv) cost curve intersects the m

  • Q : Monopolistic competition in market power

    A firm which has some market power but for that long-run profit is prevented by freedom of entry and exit is engaged within: (1) pure monopoly. (2) pure oligopoly. (3) monopolistic competition. (4) socially responsible behavior. (5) pure competition.<

  • Q : Decrement in opportunity costs and

    Opportunity costs and prices tend to be decreased by: (w) competition among speculators and other intermediaries. (x) price floors. (y) the exercise of monopoly power. (z) price ceilings. How can I

  • Q : Problem on Jurisdictional Strikes The

    The Taft-Hartley Act prohibited strikes against the firm over the issue of which of two or more competing unions would symbolize the firm’s employees. These strikes are termed as: (i) Jurisdictional strikes. (ii) Strategic representation strikes

  • Q : Problem related to Sellers markets

    Seller’s markets frequently exist when: (i) There are extensive surpluses. (ii) Prices are increasing. (iii) The government enforces price floors. (iv) Inventories are much high. Can someone please help me in finding out the