Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Upwardly sloping supplies of resources

    When supplies of some resources are upwardly sloping to an industry, in that case increasing the industry’s output results within: (w) higher output due to increased profits from falling input prices. (x) reductions of output because of increase

  • Q : Demand of a competitive firm The

    The competitive firm will demand more labor when: (i) Technological advances support automation. (ii) The price of firm's output increases. (iii) More firms enter in the industry. (iv) The value of marginal product is beneath the wage rate. (v) Worker

  • Q : Average revenue and marginal revenue

    In spite of of the amount sold, price equals for a price-taker firm on both average: (i) revenue and marginal revenue. (ii) variable cost and marginal cost. (iii) fixed cost and average variable cost. (iv) total cost and marginal revenue.

  • Q : Family Allowance Plans for Income

    Government payments generally provided into European nations which are roughly sufficient to feed and clothe each child within a family are parts of programs termed as: (w) Family Allowance Plans [FAPs]. (x) negative income taxes [NITs]. (y) indigent subsidy plans [IS

  • Q : When is not total annual revenue

    As per this demonstrated figure in below, unless something changes the total annual revenue of Robot Butlers, Inc. Can’t exceed: (1) $10,000. (2) $20,000. (3) $100 million. (4) $200 million. (5) $400 million.

  • Q : Rate of return on financial investment

    When you can buy a bond today for $1,000 and this will mature at $1,210 two years from currently, the rate of return on this financial investment is: (1) 10%. (2) 10.5%. (3) 11%. (4) 12%. (5) 21%.

    Q : Problem on Economic Capital Your

    Your construction company just bought a bulldozer on credit. From the viewpoint of your company, this bulldozer is an illustration of: (i) Liability. (ii) Fixed costs. (iii) Net variable cost. (iv) Capitalization. (v) Economic capital.

    Q : Collective Bargaining-managers and

    The strikes tend to be resolved after worker’s savings trickle down to a discomfort region and there is an exhaustion of: (i) Public tolerance, causing government to set the fair settlement. (ii) Managers and inventories, causing the firms to increase their offe

  • Q : Consumer Surplus-Difference in amounts

    Kiley pays $1.00 for the cold Pepsi on a hot afternoon, however would be willing to pay $5.00. The $4.00 difference in such amounts is her: (i) Consumer surplus. (ii) Income effect. (iii) Economic gain. (iv) Marginal utility. (v) Pleasure coefficient.

    Q : Problem on shortages or surpluses I

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on shortages or surpluses. Please help me in the following question. No shortages or surpluses exist if: (1) Central planners set prices which equivalent production costs. (2) The market is in equilibrium. (3)

©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.