--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium of two consumers

The economy consists of two consumers, A and B. Both consumers are endowed with one unit of good 1 and one unit of good 2. Consumer A is entirely indifferent between all consumption plans. Consumer B has the utility function u(xB1 ; xB2 ) = xB1 xB2 .

(i) Find a competitive equilibrium for this economy. (Hint: guess an equilibrium price and then check that it works.)

(ii) Find a second competitive equilibrium (different from the one you found in part (i)).

(iii) Show that the equilibrium is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2 = p1(1) + p2(2)

Similarly  for person 2:

P1x1+ p2x2= p1(1) + p2(2)

Now person 1 will consume according to the MRS= Price Ratio condition and we get:

So we get:
X1* = 1/2 (p1+1)/p1
X2*= 1/2 (p1+1)/p2

Similarily for person 2:
X1*= X1* = 1/2 (p1+1)/p1
X2*= 1/2 (p1+1)/p2

Now total x1* in economy is 2

So p1+1/p1= 2
P1+1= 2P1
So, p1*=1
And p2=1 (numeraire)

So competitive equilibrium:
(1,1) – Person 1
(1,1)- Person 2

b) second competitive equilibrium

(1/3, 2/3) and( 2/3, 1/3)

c) For efficiency MRS1= MRS2

Now x2/x1= x2/x1
For above(Put the values 1/3, 2/3 and 2/3,1/3 in MRS condition 2 not equal to 1

So this is not efficient

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Federal agricultural subsidies Federal

    Federal agricultural subsidies tend to be rapidly: (w) spent because most farmers lack sufficient budgeting skills. (x) capitalized in higher prices for farm land. (y) slashed while pressure mounts to cut the federal deficit. (z) absorbed from rising

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand on mid point

    When 900 tons of gourmet coffee beans are sold per month at $5.40 per pound but sales drop to 500 tons while its price rises to $7.20 per pound, the price elasticity of demand for that coffee based upon the mid-point or say arc formula is: (i) 2.0. (i

  • Q : Rates of Return of Cash Flow Assume

    Assume that an apartment complex is predicted to produce a consistent net $800,000 cash flow yearly in rent, after deducting all recurring variable costs (for example, taxes, utilities, and maintenance). When its current price is $10

  • Q : Marginal Revenue and Costs in purely

    Hey friends I need your suggestion for this query about the profit and losses as illustrated graph when this firm produces q2 output, in that case its: (w) MR > MC. (x) MR < MC. (y) MR = MC. (z) P > MC.Please give me right answer for the same.

  • Q : When is demand more elastic at a price

    Along this demonstrated in below demand curve for DVD games, demand is more elastic at a price of: (w) $10. (x) $6. (y) $1. (z) zero.

    Q : Price equality to marginal costs A

    A nondiscriminating monopolist's equilibrium output is inconsistent along with: (w) marginal revenue equals marginal cost [MR = MC]. (x) price equal to marginal costs [P = MC]. (y) price exceeding average variable costs [P > AVC]. (z) price exceedi

  • Q : Various close substitutes and little

    The demand for an exact good tends to be relatively more price elastic when the good: (1) has various close substitutes and very little complements. (2) is taken as a necessity in place of a luxury. (3) is an inferior good. (4) is rel

  • Q : Moral Hazard evidence Cameron is

    Cameron is performing a research project on whale migration at Pacific Ocean. To assist with this research she hires a Ph.D. from the MIT to make computer software to organize data, paying the software genius $150,000 for his services. The Ph.D. assures Cameron that t

  • Q : Problem on Monopsony Power The firm

    The firm probable to encompass significant monopsony power in its labor market would be: (1) Big cotton farm in the Texas hiring migrant workers. (2) Textile producer in the Hong Kong hiring factory workers. (3) Janitorial service firm in London hiring the maintenance

  • Q : Normal and Inferior Goods Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options that when a fixed level of national income becomes appreciably less evenly distributed as the numbers of relatively poor people and relatively prosperous people both raise dr