Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

View Complete Question

Related Questions in Public Economics

Q : Illustrates a case of Scarcity and

Every decision involves opportunity costs due to the fundamental facts which underpin: (i) limits to human reason. (ii) production technology. (iii) limits to human wants. (iv) demand and supply analysis. (v) scarcity.

Q : Validation of a new theory in

A new theory evolves within common sense only after this is determined: (1) Helpful through extensive testing. (2) Within conformity along with Newtonian mechanics and Occam's razor. (3) To contain relatively only some exceptions. (4) Acceptable through the Institute

Q : Why are Land Land, labor, and capital

Land, labor, and capital are all scarce since: (w) human wants are restricted. (x) less is obtainable than people want. (y) each productive resource needs a monetary return for its use. (z) once employed they cannot be used again.

Q : Give an example of Production in

By using knowledge and/or technology to apply energy to change materials, thereby making the materials more precious is: (w) production. (x) demand. (y) a total cure for scarcity. (z) economically profitable. Can someone clarify/he

Q : Effect of current investment Can

Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. Expanding the current investment associative to current consumption most directly raises an economy’s rate of: (1) Stagnation. (2) Capital absorption. (3) Economic growt

Q : Problem regarding the distributive

Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ

Q : Consequence of the increased

People would be least probable to be happier like a consequence of the increased accessibility of: (1) free goods. (2) economic resources. (3) superior technologies. (4) economic goods. (5) economic bads. Hello guys I want your adv

Q : Economics as a region of study

Economics like a region of study largely focuses upon: (1) class, power and status relationships. (2) Government policies to cure poverty. (3) Scarcity and decision making. (4) Accounting and financial relationships. (5) profit-maximizing business strategies.

Q : Example of wasted water in inefficiency

Why do people usually assume that water run on sidewalks and within the street while they water their lawns? Is that wasted water a symbol of inefficiency?

Q : Example of Relative Price Suppose a

Suppose a deluxe hamburger is $5, an Oreo blizzard is $3, and a soda is $1. Then the relative price of the hamburger is: (a) 1.6 blizzards. (b) four sodas and half of a blizzard. (c) two blizzards. (d) a blizzard and one soda.

Discover Q & A

Leading Solution Library

Avail More Than 1440272 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads

No hassle, Instant Access

Start Discovering

18,76,764

1953615
Asked

3,689

Active Tutors

1440272

Questions
Answered

Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

Submit Assignment