--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Assignments I want it tomorrow night or

    I want it tomorrow night or before, please.

  • Q : Crime punishment suggest by Jeremy

    Suggestion of Jeremy Bentham that crime must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of intent, remorse or motive.” His proposal would result within more than the optimal amount of crime due to the:

  • Q : Esurience of economy-wide efficiency

    For a specified distribution of income, economy-wide efficiency would make sure a: (i) Redistribution to make equal income. (ii) Minimal level of pollution. (iii) Maximum level of particular identity. (iv) Maximum value for whole production.

  • Q : People thinking about invisible hand of

    Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” consider as to a process through which people think: (w) trying to serve their own interests also exploit social well being. (x) rely upon democratic governments to make main economic decisions. (y) base

  • Q : Give an example of Production in

    By using knowledge and/or technology to apply energy to change materials, thereby making the materials more precious is: (w) production. (x) demand. (y) a total cure for scarcity. (z) economically profitable. Can someone clarify/he

  • Q : Problem on public sector The word “

    The word “public sector” signifies to: (1) Stockholders and households. (2) Investors and Consumers. (3) Households and investors. (4) Democratic voting systems. (5) All actions of government. Find out the right answer from the above optio

  • Q : Law of diminishing returns The idea

    The idea that costs ultimately grow faster than output if output is expanded obeys logically from the law of: (i) Increasing expectations. (ii) Raising returns to scale. (iii) Diminishing returns. (iv) Demand and supply. (v) Rational effects.

    Q : Idealized version of pure capitalism

    Beneath an idealized version of the pure capitalism, governments would be least probable to offer: (1) Judicial systems to defend private property rights. (2) National defense. (3) Standardized forms of money. (4) Court systems to implement contracts.

  • Q : Illustrates a case of Scarcity and

    Every decision involves opportunity costs due to the fundamental facts which underpin: (i) limits to human reason. (ii) production technology. (iii) limits to human wants. (iv) demand and supply analysis. (v) scarcity.

    Q : Illustrates the problem of Productive

    At present, at Bob's Candle shop, Arjuna and Krishna share the jobs of making molds and making candles. Nonetheless, while Arjuna is best at making molds and Krishna is much better at creating the candles, then: (a) Bob’s shop is experiencing allocative although