--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Example of Normative Macroeconomics

    To say that high joblessness rates in this prosperous country are a national disgrace would be an illustration of a: (w) normative macroeconomic statement. (x) positive macroeconomic statement. (y) positive microeconomic statement. (z) normative microeconomic statemen

    		•
  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

    		•
  • Q : Improvements in Economic growth I have

    I have a problem in economics on Improvements in Economic growth. Please help me in the following question. Economic growth would be encouraged by enhancements in: (1) Economic efficiency. (2) Technology. (3) People’s attitudes. (4) Unemployment

    		•
  • Q : Founder of utilitarianism Jeremy

    Jeremy Bentham [from 1748 to 1832] was: (1) the owner of a pet pig he permitted to roam by his mansion. (2) the founder of utilitarianism. (3) appointed to the Board of Trustees of the University of London, and keeps on the Board today. (4) stuffed an

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the positive technical

    Positive technical statements: (w) need value judgments. (x) should be valid by definition. (y) can be proved and tested or disproved by fact and logic. (z) are the excellent guides in specifying economic policies.

  • Q : Fee-simple property rights I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Fee-simple property rights. Please help me in the following question. Fee-simple property rights are a broad division of: (i) Common law. (ii) Positive externalities. (iii) Negative externalities. (iv) Public property

    		•
  • Q : Comparative Systems- Central planning

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. The command economy is mainly based on: (i) Laissez faire govt. policies and private property rights. (ii) ‘kolkhoz’ decision making. (iii) Well tuning production to match the

    		•
  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

    		•
  • Q : Case of fuel efficient machinery in

    If the soybean market begins in equilibrium on S0D0, and in that case farm machinery becomes more fuel efficient, the market changes to: (1) S0D1. (2) S1D2. (3) S1D0. (4) S2D1

    		•
  • Q : Define the root of normative economics

    Value judgments which address what “must be” are at the root of: (1) microeconomics. (2) scarcity economics. (3) normative economics. (4) positive economics. (5) macroeconomics. How can

    		•