--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain about market buyers A buyers’

    A buyers’ market is a market in that: (w) queuing to secure goods is common. (x) the current market price is below equilibrium. (y) demand exceeds supply. (z) several sellers experience surpluses. I need a go

  • Q : Achieving economic welfare For any

    For any given point on the production possibilities (or PPF) curve: (i) More economic welfare is achieved than from any points within the PPF. (ii) Moving to some other output combination should yield enhanced economic welfare. (iii) More of some good can be generated

  • Q : Opportunity or alternative costs when

    Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?

  • Q : Incentives to create and to use goods

    Please help me to solve the problem of prices which is given below: Information regarding incentives to create and to use goods efficiently is imbedded most directly within: (i) Relative prices. (ii) Normative econ

  • Q : Calculate the net investment of machines

    Freddy's Fabulous Faux Frisbee Factory consists of fifty rapid frisbee forming machines. In recent year Freddy bought new fifteen rapid frisbee forming machines as well as retired five of them, all they are resulting within: (1) Net investment of 10 machines. (2) Gros

  • Q : Define the normative economic statement

    Which of the given is a normative economic statement? (1) Most Republicans favor the death penalty for murderers. (2) Punishment which is surer, swifter, and harsher decreases the rates of violent crime. (3) Most Democrats oppose the death penalty for

  • Q : Case of fuel efficient machinery in

    If the soybean market begins in equilibrium on S0D0, and in that case farm machinery becomes more fuel efficient, the market changes to: (1) S0D1. (2) S1D2. (3) S1D0. (4) S2D1

  • Q : Define the root of normative economics

    Value judgments which address what “must be” are at the root of: (1) microeconomics. (2) scarcity economics. (3) normative economics. (4) positive economics. (5) macroeconomics. How can

  • Q : Behavior of deliberately act in

    Deliberately acting in a way which cannot attain a wanted goal is: (w) rational behavior. (x) random behavior. (y) irrational behavior. (z) maximizing behavior. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

  • Q : Explains economic problem posed for

    The chorus of a Rolling Stones' song begins along with a line that is, "You can't always acquire what you wish for," that broadly explains the economic problem posed by which factor: (v) scarcity, (w) opportunity costs (x) human greed (y) diminishing returns and (z) marginal utility? How