--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Uses of Normative Economics over

    Can anybody propose the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Normative Economics. Positive economic analysis might NOT be used to test the idea which higher cigarette taxes would reas

  • Q : Governmental allocations of goods I

    I have a problem in economics on Governmental allocations of goods. Please help me in determining the accurate answer of the following question. Pure capitalism is least reliable with: (i) Governmental allocations of goods. (ii) Laissez-faire policies

  • Q : Idealized version of pure capitalism

    Beneath an idealized version of the pure capitalism, governments would be least probable to offer: (1) Judicial systems to defend private property rights. (2) National defense. (3) Standardized forms of money. (4) Court systems to implement contracts.

  • Q : Case of economic capital involve in

    When Farmer MacDonald decides to plant a field complete of rutabagas, the economic capital involved within such crop production process would consist of the: (i) tractor he rides. (ii) land he farms. (iii) physical effort he puts into farming. (iv) money invested from

  • Q : Improvements in Economic growth I have

    I have a problem in economics on Improvements in Economic growth. Please help me in the following question. Economic growth would be encouraged by enhancements in: (1) Economic efficiency. (2) Technology. (3) People’s attitudes. (4) Unemployment

  • Q : Excessive production as a problem Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Governments which attempt to utilize ‘needs’ or ‘equality’ as the bases for distributing goods are NOT probable to: (1) Encounter extreme production as a problem. (2) R

  • Q : Illustrate positive economic analysis

    Income tax rates were cut during 1981 year, and again in 2001 year. A question is here that, at least in theory, may be resolved through positive economic analysis is: (w) How do changes in tax rates influence employment and national

  • Q : Explain the problem of Macroeconomics

    Hello guys please suggest your answer for the given problem: A problem which MOST involves a macroeconomic problem is the result of a: (w) drought on the price of corn. (x) tax reform on the incomes of financial planners. (y) steel

  • Q : Characteristics of Private property and

    I have a problem in economics on the Characteristics of Private property and laissez faire policies. Please help me in the following question. Private property and laissez faire policies are characteristics of: (1) Fascism. (2) Socialism. (3) Monarchy

  • Q : Consequence of the increased

    People would be least probable to be happier like a consequence of the increased accessibility of: (1) free goods. (2) economic resources. (3) superior technologies. (4) economic goods. (5) economic bads. Hello guys I want your adv