--%>

Better off and worse off condition in normative economics

When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding better off and worse off condition in normative economics generally?

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Problem regarding Property Rights Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. Fee simple rights don’t comprise the right to: (1) Demolish your property. (2) Sell your property. (3) Employ your property for your own advantage. (4) Damage another’s propert

  • Q : Influence of decisions on consumers

    Consumer’s preferences tend to be most proficiently met whenever decisions are made: (1) Individually. (2) Through democratic voting. (3) In command economy. (4) To share out income according to requirement. What is the right

  • Q : Uses of Normative Economics over

    Can anybody propose the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Normative Economics. Positive economic analysis might NOT be used to test the idea which higher cigarette taxes would reas

  • Q : Define positive technical statement on

    A positive technical statement on the subject of college life is which: (1) college deans are more moral than department chairs. (2) elite colleges frequently admit the wrong students. (3) history professors and accounting professors deserve similar pay. (4) on averag

  • Q : Requirement of goods for economic

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic efficiency. Please suggest me your suggestion that the need for economic efficiency which society should produce the goods people want is termed as: (i) allocative inefficiency. (ii) productive inefficiency. (iii) distribu

  • Q : Driving issues in economics The driving

    The driving issues within economics are like: (w) income distribution and wealth. (x) productive inefficiency and waste. (y) restricted resources and unlimited human desires. (z) financial planning and mismanagement.

    Q : Example of Relative Price Suppose a

    Suppose a deluxe hamburger is $5, an Oreo blizzard is $3, and a soda is $1. Then the relative price of the hamburger is: (a) 1.6 blizzards. (b) four sodas and half of a blizzard. (c) two blizzards. (d) a blizzard and one soda.

    Q : Why scientific analysis not used to

    Scientific analysis can’t be used to test the economic assertion which: (w) all nation within the world allocates several economic resources from government agencies. (x) most transitional economies consist of experienced difficulties of falling output and incre

  • Q : When is Self-interest evident How can I

    How can I solve my following problem? Please suggest me the correct answer. Explain reason Self interest is evident while: (i) A mugger utilizes a $1 bullet upon his victim to take $100 by his wallet. (ii) Helen cr

  • Q : Concept of income more to the poor than

    The concept about, on average, further income implies more to the poor than to the rich conforms most to the teachings or philosophy of: (1) Thorstein Veblen. (2) Friedrich Nietzsche. (3) Gautama Buddha. (4) Jeremy Bentham. (5) Nostradamus. (6) Adam S