--%>

No close substitutes in monopoly

When Perpetual Motion Corporation’s recently-invented and patented teleporter buttons have no close substitutes, in that case Perpetual Motion operates: (1) along with absolute certainty of realizing a pure economic profit. (2) in violation of the laws of demand and supply. (3) as a monopoly in the teleporter button market. (4) behind the wall of an illegal barrier to entry. (5) efficiently although inequitably from the vantage of the rest of society.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Signaling and Screening Completing your

    Completing your degree is most probable to be a significant signal which will help you in securing a well-paid job with bright future when potential employers: (i) Want to make sure that job applicants have already acquired important amounts of precise human capital.

  • Q : Elasticity and profit maximization An

    An imperfectly competitive firm can maximize profit within the long run only at prices and also outputs where demand elasticity is: (w) greater than or equal to 1. (x) less than 1. (y) less than 0. (z) between 0 and 1.

    Q : Experience of mill for constant cost

    When generic lumber processing is a constant cost industry, within the long run this lumber mill is probable to experience a: (i) a severe shrinking of economic profit to zero. (ii) a decline within the price of 2×4s to about $2.40 apiece. (iii)

  • Q : Define Marginal rate of transformation

    Marginal rate of transformation: This is the amount of one good which should be given to generate one additional unit of a second good. This is also termed as marginal opportunity cost.

  • Q : Maximum possible profitable firm A firm

    A firm possessing important market power may suffer by managerial slack [X-inefficiency] and unessential high costs, which implies that, the firm: (i) is likely to be absorbed through a predatory rival. (ii) realizes less than the max

  • Q : Price floor for Whopper Slushees The

    The government price floor for Whopper Slushees at P3 would result a: (i) shortage of Q1 – Q3. (ii) Excess of Q3 - Q1. (iii) Supply price of P1. (iv) Quantity demanded of Q2. (v) Demand price of P2.

    Q : Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility

    The law of diminishing marginal utility might be evidenced by the person: (i) Smoking more however enjoying it less. (ii) Purchasing a new car subsequent to getting an increase. (iii) Distributing excess food to starving children. (iv) Who studies muc

  • Q : Illustrate ready-to-eat cereal industry

    Brands of ready-to-eat cereal by Kellogg, Post, General Mills and Quaker [for example Frosted Flakes, Raisin Bran and Cheerios] account for more 85 percent of all breakfast cereals sold. Here the ready-to-eat cereal industry is an illustration of: (w)

  • Q : Critics of current welfare programs

    Critics of current welfare programs who desire the welfare system scaled down tend to argue which welfare reform should give: (1) whatever this takes to lift all people out of poverty. (2) poor people with incentives to work. (3) nothing; there should

  • Q : Discounted present value of future net

    A fundamental principle of finance is that the value of any of investment is: (w) the discounted present value of all future net cash flows expected by the investment. (x) negatively related to the future net cash flows generated from the investment. (y) the sum of al