--%>

Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of gene pool

Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of individual gene pool like the fundamental human drive, and give numerous illustrations of behavior which apparently conflict along with the economist's homo economicus supposition: Parents sacrifice their whole lives for their children, or they invest into their kids' college educations therefore the subsequently generation will enjoy richer lives. Conversely, people adopt other people's biological children and several childless people are voluntarily sterilized or connect religious orders which need sexual self-denial. To what extent may perpetuation of one's gene pool conflict along with self-interested behavior? Which of such assumptions do you believe will more precisely predict human behavior?

E

Expert

Verified

The illustrations cited through sociobiologists comprise sacrificing one's life for your children or in combat, for friends considers incompatible along with models depends on self-interest. Furthermore, sociobiology may give insights into several questions such that conventional economics models can’t address very sufficiently. For illustration, children participating within Head Start programs do not show to gain more knowledge than their non-participating siblings. Therefore Sociobiology suggests about this that an impoverished family might react to particularly favorable outside affects for one child by decreasing parental attention to that one child, when devoting more attention to children without the particular advantages. It increases the chances for lives and reproduction by more of offspring by parent.

One of the disadvantages of traditional economic models is which they can’t easily distinguish between the motives of families and their individuals. Even though sociobiology does give unique insights within family dynamics and a thin range of other economic matters, the traditional economic assumption of self interest considers much richer in producing useful predictions regarding a much extensive range of human behavior.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Economic questions incapability of

    Economic questions incapable of scientific verification like to correctness or falsity, as like why, how and when to prosecute and execute alleged murderers, or to whom income must be again distributed, fall in the category of: (1) positive economics.

  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

  • Q : Illustrates a problem of Distributive

    Bob the Baker and Bill the Butcher while both would be willing to trade three loaves of bread for a pair of T-Bone steaks, but for several reasons they not include: (i) Bob must become a vegetarian so he doesn't contain to rely upon Bill. (ii) The economy has producti

  • Q : Fee-simple private property rights I

    I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. “Fee-simple” private property rights permit you to: (1) Shoot trespassers who are on your land with no permission. (2) Refuse to

  • Q : Requirements of each and every economic

    In contrast to free goods, each and every economic goods: (1) Raise happiness. (2) Are taxed. (3) Need large amounts of human labor to generate. (4) Entail opportunity costs? Please help me to solve the problem of

  • Q : Concept of income more to the poor than

    The concept about, on average, further income implies more to the poor than to the rich conforms most to the teachings or philosophy of: (1) Thorstein Veblen. (2) Friedrich Nietzsche. (3) Gautama Buddha. (4) Jeremy Bentham. (5) Nostradamus. (6) Adam S

  • Q : Opportunity cost of buying a new car I

    I need a good answer upon the topic of opportunity cost problems. What is the opportunity cost of buying a new car: (i) last dollar price one pays for this. (ii) Value of the old car traded within. (iii) Sticker pr

  • Q : Better off with less in economic

    Anything of that people would be better off with less is which from given issue: (1) economic surplus, (2) external cost, (3) economic bad and (4) adverse consequence. Hello guys I need your advice. Please recommend some idea for a

  • Q : When is an economic system economically

    An economic system is economically efficient when: (w) economic inequity has been removed. (x) any gains to someone through several possible rearrangement of goods or resources would need losses on the part of someone else. (y) more o

  • Q : Basic economic questions NOT included

    The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...