Basic economic questions NOT included
The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...
The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How?
Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...
Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economic Goals that is given below: Almost everybody in the world would favor a normative economic aim that people all over must have: (i) high standards of living.
The country’s production-possibilities curve exhibits: (i) Which combination of goods are best for the society. (ii) Output combinations which fully employ society's resources. (iii) Demands for various resources. (iv) Monetary quantities and pr
Desirable items without opportunity costs are termed as: (i) free goods. (ii) economic goods. (iii) capital goods. (iv) financial goods. (v) gifts of nature. Hey friends please give your view for the problem of opportunity
When goods are traded and several families gain without worsening other families' well-being, so in that case the initial distribution of goods should have been: (w) optimal. (x) distributively inefficient. (y) superior to the new dis
I have a problem in economics on the Characteristics of Private property and laissez faire policies. Please help me in the following question. Private property and laissez faire policies are characteristics of: (1) Fascism. (2) Socialism. (3) Monarchy
Can anybody advise me the proper explanation for given problem regarding macroeconomics in Economics generally. In macroeconomics, where we examine all things like the: (w) problems of What, How, and For Whom. (x)
The behavior on the given list most consistent along with relative prices serving like a rationing device, and not mainly as incentives, would be as: (i) Marcia, a status-seeking social climber that turning down requests of Wayne for dates after seeing small numbers u
The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<
For a specified distribution of income, economy-wide efficiency would make sure a: (i) Redistribution to make equal income. (ii) Minimal level of pollution. (iii) Maximum level of particular identity. (iv) Maximum value for whole production.
Which economic philosopher would have been most probably to have asserted which people do not have bad motives while they make wrong decisions; quite, they make bad computations? (w) Thomas Malthus. (x) Sir Edwin Chadwick. (y) Nassau Senior. (z) Jeremy Bentham. <
18,76,764
1933797 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1431099
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!